Question on liouville's theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RedX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Liouville's theorem and its implications in the context of phase space dynamics, particularly in particle accelerators. Participants explore the relationship between phase space density, chaos, and the potential for nuclear transmutation using high-energy proton beams.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Liouville's theorem indicates that phase space density behaves like an incompressible fluid, raising questions about its compatibility with chaotic behavior in phase space.
  • Others reference a particle phase space simulation in a linear proton accelerator, suggesting that protons can enter chaotic regions after crossing a separatrix.
  • One participant speculates on the feasibility of turning lead into gold through particle acceleration, questioning the processes involved and the energy requirements for protons and neutrons.
  • Another participant discusses the challenges and costs associated with nuclear transmutation using particle beams, noting that while phase space predictions hold, chaos can still arise due to various factors in the accelerator.
  • Concerns are raised about the nature of chaos in collimated proton beams, questioning how chaos can exist in a controlled setting.
  • Participants discuss the differences between neutron capture and proton-induced transformations, highlighting the complexities of nuclear interactions and the uncertainty surrounding the outcomes of such processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of Liouville's theorem in chaotic systems, the feasibility of nuclear transmutation, and the nature of chaos in particle beams. No consensus is reached on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about energy levels and the behavior of particles in accelerators, as well as the complexities of nuclear reactions, without resolving these uncertainties.

RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
Liouville's theorem says that the phase space density moves as an incompressible fluid.

In other words, if you follow a point in phase space, the number of points surrounding that point will always be the same.

Does this contradict the concept of chaos, which says that points in phase space spread out with time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured out the answer, but is the paper that you linked to describing how to turn lead into gold?

How does that work? If you accelerate a proton near a nucleus, then the beam proton changes into a neutron beam and emits a +1 pion, which is captured by a neutron in the nucleus, turning it into a proton?

What's the energy of the beam proton? I assume less than .2 GeV because we're talking about hadrons and not free quarks and gluons? What happens to the neutron beam: how is it stopped (what particle process stops it)?

Since lead has a greater atomic number than gold, then you would have to do the converse process - shoot neutron beams into lead. How do you accelerate a neutron beam?

Wouldn't the resulting atom be imbalanced as far as proton/neutron ratio? Or can you send a beam of neutrons and the neutrons just stick to the nucleus without inducing a change that'll turn a proton into a neutron? Or do you send a beam of neutrons, and a neutron attaches to the nucleus, which will later beta decay (so a weak process instead of a strong process), giving you an extra proton?

And a little less serious question: should I be worried about the commodity price of gold?
 
RedX said:
I figured out the answer, but is the paper that you linked to describing how to turn lead into gold? ...And a little less serious question: should I be worried about the commodity price of gold?
Multi-MeV proton beams in particle accelerators do obey Liouvill's theorem phase space predictions during acceleration, and exhibit phase space growth with chaos. But unfortunately it is both difficult and expensive to convert platinum (Z=78) or mercury (Z=80) to gold (Z=79) using a particle beam.

Bob S.
 
Bob S said:
Multi-MeV proton beams in particle accelerators do obey Liouvill's theorem phase space predictions during acceleration, and exhibit phase space growth with chaos. But unfortunately it is both difficult and expensive to convert platinum (Z=78) or mercury (Z=80) to gold (Z=79) using a particle beam.

Bob S.

The beams are collimated one proton at a time aren't they? Why would there be chaos in such a situation?

Multi-MeV: thanks. Is that the typical range of protons under a Linac? Electrons would be the same range right, or would they brem even more than protons, so won't reach the multi-MeV range?

Platinum is worth more than gold, so you wouldn't want to turn it into gold anyway. So maybe turn whatever is Z=77 into platinum would be good.

On Wikipedia's transmutation page, there's the following quotation about converting gold into lead:

"It would be easier to convert gold into lead via neutron capture and beta decay by leaving gold in a nuclear reactor for a long period of time."

Is this better than shooting multi-MeV protons at the gold hoping to induce a transformation of a neutron into a proton via pion exchange? There's a big difference between shooting a neutron trying to induce neutron capture and shooting a proton trying to induce a transmutation of a neutron into a proton. I guess what's bothering me is if you shoot a neutron at the gold nucleus, who says neutron capture will happen instead of the neutron causing a proton in the nucleus to change into a neutron?
 
RedX said:
The beams are collimated one proton at a time aren't they? Why would there be chaos in such a situation?
In a 100-milliamp proton beam bunched at 400 MHz, there are roughly 1.5 billion protons confined by electric and magnetic fields into a bunch about 1 centimeter long. The electric and magnetic fields preserve phase space (six dimensional) as the protons are accelerated, but RF noise, magnet misalignment, and intra-beam scattering does cause the phase space to grow. A lot of opportunity for chaos.

Bob S
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K