Question on Mean Value Theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double differentiable function \( f \) defined on the interval \([0,1]\) with the condition that \(|f''(x)| \leq 1\) for all \( x \) in that interval, and \( f(0) = f(1) \). Participants are exploring implications of these conditions on the values of \( f(x) \) and \( f'(x) \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using integration and the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) to derive inequalities related to \( f(x) \) and \( f'(x) \). Some express uncertainty about how to eliminate constants from their inequalities. Others suggest considering specific points and the implications of \( f(0) = f(1) \) on the behavior of the function.

Discussion Status

There are multiple lines of reasoning being explored, with participants questioning the validity of their approaches and the assumptions made. Some have offered hints and alternative perspectives, while others are seeking a more structured solution without reaching a consensus on the correct interpretation or outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the lack of specific initial values for \( f(x) \) beyond the endpoints, which complicates the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the function's behavior across the interval.

Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Let ###f## be double differentiable function such that ##|f''(x)|\le 1## for all ##x\in [0,1]##. If f(0)=f(1), then,
A)##|f(x)|>1##
B)##|f(x)|<1##
C)##|f'(x)|>1##
D)##|f'(x)|<1##

Homework Equations


MVT: $$f'(c)=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I first tried using integration.
$$-1\le f''(x) \le 1$$
integrating from 0 to x,
$$-x\le f'(x)-f'(0) \le x$$
Again integrating from 0 to x,
$$-\frac{x^2}{2}\le f(x)-f(0)-f'(0)x \le \frac{x^2}{2}$$
But even though I got an inequality for f(x), I could not remove the constants.
Then I applied Rolle theorem for f(x). Since f(0)=f(1), there exists a point (at least one point) ##c## such that f'(c)=0.
There exists a point ##X\in [c,x]## such that
$$f''(X)=\frac{f(x)-f(c)}{x-c}$$
Here, ##x\in [c,1]##, and since 1>x>c, x-c<1. Also, ##|f''(x)|\le 1##.
$$f''(X)=\frac{f(x)-f(c)}{x-c}$$
So, ##\frac{f(x)-f(c)}{x-c}\le 1## and ##f(x)-f(c)\le {x-c}##. Hence I get the answer D. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Titan97 said:

Homework Statement


Let ##f## be double differentiable function such that ##|f''(x)|\le 1## for all ##x\in [0,1]##. If f(0)=f(1), then,
A)##|f(x)|>1##
B)##|f(x)|<1##
C)##|f'(x)|>1##
D)##|f'(x)|<1##

Homework Equations


MVT: $$f'(c)=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I first tried using integration.

Metahints for real analysis:

If you're given a continuous function on a closed bounded interval and told its values at the end points, consider applying the intermediate value theorem.
If you're given a differentiable function on a closed bounded interval and told its values at the end points, consider applying the mean value theorem.

Then I applied Rolle theorem for f(x). Since f(0)=f(1), there exists a point (at least one point) ##c## such that f'(c)=0.
There exists a point ##X\in [c,x]## such that

$$f''(X)=\frac{f(x)-f(c)}{x-c}$$

There are two problems here. Firstly I take it you are applying the MVT to f&#039; rather than f, so X satisfies <br /> f&#039;&#039;(X) = \frac{f&#039;(x) - f&#039;(c)}{x - c} = \frac{f&#039;(x)}{x - c}.

Secondly, writing X \in [c,x] implicitly requires that c \leq x. But you have to prove a result for every x \in [0,1], so you have also to deal with the case x &gt; c. However that requires no further work, since as long as x \neq c there is an X lying between x and c which satisfies the above equation.

Here, ##x\in [c,1]##, and since 1>x>c, x-c<1. Also, ##|f''(x)|\le 1##.

Thus if x = c then |f&#039;(x)| = 0, and if x \neq c then |f&#039;(x)| &lt; \dots
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Titan97
Titan97 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I first tried using integration.
$$-1\le f''(x) \le 1$$
integrating from 0 to x,
$$-x\le f'(x)-f'(0) \le x$$
Again integrating from 0 to x,
$$-\frac{x^2}{2}\le f(x)-f(0)-f'(0)x \le \frac{x^2}{2}$$
But even though I got an inequality for f(x), I could not remove the constants.
What does that inequality look like when x = 1? That will give you bounds on f'(0).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Titan97
What if you define ##f'(x) = f'(0) + \int_0^x f''(t) dt ##?
Then using the inequality ## \left| \int f dx \right| \leq \int |f| dx##
You can quickly deduce something about f'(x).

Then, since f(0) = f(1), you can say that
##\int_0^c f'(x) dx = -\int_c^0 f'(x) dx##
You can find a maximum for this based on the same inequality.

I doubt you can say anything about |f(x)| since you aren't given anything that might constrain the initial values. f(0) = f(1) = 100 might be an option based on what you provided.
 
@pasmith , that was a typo. I lost internet connection while trying to edit. @RUber, i found the minimum and maximum vaue f'(0) can take. $$-1/2 \le f'(0) \le 1/2$$
 
Last edited:
But, from the equation, ##-x\le f'(x)-f(0)\le x## and by substituting the max value of f'(0), ##-x+0.5\le f'(x)\le x+0.5## and at x=1, f'(x)>1. Is that correct?
 
Titan97 , do you want a proper solution , or would getting the answer alone simply be enough ?

I haven't actually tried the question , but you could consider a function as f(x) = x(x - 1)/4 .

Solving this can easily tell you about f'(x) ; however I don't believe you can comment on f(x) on the basis of what's given in the original question .

I know this isn't a proper solution , but still ... Hope this helps .
 
I want a proper solution. I know many substitutions that can give the answer to such questions.
 
Titan97 said:
I want a proper solution. I know many substitutions that can give the answer to such questions.
Okay , first of - You cannot comment on value of f(x) .

For f'(x) - Let f'(x) = k ( f'(0) + x ) , where k is such that -1 <= k <= 1 .

f'(0) = - 0.5 , and so f'(x) = k ( x - 0.5 ) .
( x - 0.5 ) varies from - 0.5 to 0.5 .
⇒ k ( x - 0.5 ) will belong to some interval lesser than equal ( - 0.5 , 0.5 ) - Depending on the value of k

Hope this helps .
 
  • #10
what about post 6?
 
  • #11
Hint: There is a point x_0\in (0,1) such that f&#039;(x_0)=0. If x is another point in (0,1), then you can use the fact that |x-x_0|&lt;1 together with the information about f&#039;&#039; to estimate f&#039;(x).
 
  • #12
Titan97 said:
what about post 6?
F'(0) has a fixed value -
Qwertywerty said:
f'(0) = - 0.5 , and so f'(x) = k ( x - 0.5 ) .
( x - 0.5 ) varies from - 0.5 to 0.5 .
 
  • #13
Qwertywerty said:
Okay , first of - You cannot comment on value of f(x) .

For f'(x) - Let f'(x) = k ( f'(0) + x ) , where k is such that -1 <= k <= 1 .

f'(0) = - 0.5 , and so f'(x) = k ( x - 0.5 ) .
( x - 0.5 ) varies from - 0.5 to 0.5 .
⇒ k ( x - 0.5 ) will belong to some interval lesser than equal ( - 0.5 , 0.5 ) - Depending on the value of k

Hope this helps .
Made a mistake here . I'll get back to you once I correct it .
 
  • #14
RUber said:
What if you define ##f'(x) = f'(0) + \int_0^x f''(t) dt ##?
Then using the inequality ## \left| \int f dx \right| \leq \int |f| dx##
You can quickly deduce something about f'(x).

Then, since f(0) = f(1), you can say that
##\int_0^c f'(x) dx = -\int_c^0 f'(x) dx##
You can find a maximum for this based on the same inequality.

I doubt you can say anything about |f(x)| since you aren't given anything that might constrain the initial values. f(0) = f(1) = 100 might be an option based on what you provided.
If you use the facts here, knowing that f'(c)=0, consider that f' goes directly from its initial value to zero as quickly as possible given constraints on f". The smallest c possible is zero. From there, assume max departure from zero using the max for f". How far from zero can f' get on the remainder of the unit interval?
 
  • #15
I did not understand that properly @RUber .
 
  • #16
I'm not sure why my post #11 is being ignored; it really suffices to solve the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Titan97
  • #17
Its the same thing i have given in the original post. It does work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K