Question on use of Piezoelectric sensor:

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of piezoelectric sensors, particularly in measuring slowly varying forces from a plasma plume. Participants explore the feasibility of using piezoelectric materials in high-temperature environments and consider alternative measurement methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the ability of piezoelectric sensors to measure static or slowly varying forces, specifically questioning the frequency response and potential signal loss due to equipment impedance.
  • Another participant suggests that piezoelectric sensors can operate down to around 10Hz, but warns about issues with bleedoff at lower frequencies.
  • A participant notes that strain gauges are unsuitable for their application due to high temperatures from the plasma plume, which could damage the gauge.
  • There is a suggestion to explore optical or acoustic methods for measurement, although one participant points out that this may not be feasible in a vacuum environment.
  • One participant mentions finding a solution involving electronics to control the plasma pulse period, allowing for the use of piezoelectric sensors at higher frequencies.
  • Concerns are raised about the depolarization of piezoelectric crystals at high temperatures, with references to specific materials that can withstand up to 1100K.
  • Another participant questions the potential for utilizing magnetic properties of the plasma plume for measurement, while also requesting a sketch of the experimental setup.
  • There are inquiries about the use of piezoelectric sensors for recording low substrate vibrations, with a participant affirming that it is possible depending on the chosen sensors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the suitability of piezoelectric sensors for the specific application, with some supporting their use and others questioning their effectiveness at low frequencies and high temperatures. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to measurement.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations related to the frequency response of piezoelectric sensors, the impact of high temperatures on sensor performance, and the challenges of measuring in a vacuum environment. There are also uncertainties regarding the effects of repeated heating and cooling cycles on sensor materials.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers and practitioners interested in sensor technology, particularly in high-temperature and vacuum applications, as well as those exploring alternative measurement methods in experimental setups.

H_man
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am aware that in the traditional sense Piezoelectric crystals/ceramics cannot be used to measure static/steady state forces.

However, I was wondering how low their frequency response can go.

That is, is it possible to measure a force of maximum strength 1mN that will develop from zero slowly (over a period of about 0.5-1second) to maximum strength and then dissipate over the same period.

I am worried that my signal will get lost due to the (of course) non-infinite impedance of voltage measuring equipment.

Is my fear justified? Can such a "slowly" varying force be measured?

This is my first foray into the world of such sensitive measurements and any help or suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If I recall correctly, you can go down to around 10Hz with PZT. Anything slower than that you'll have to worry about bleedoff.

Is there any reason a simple strain gage would not work for your application?
 
Thanks Enigma,

Yup, I can´t use a strain gauge as I am measuring the impulse from a plasma plume. The high temperatures would kill the gauge very quickly.

I stopped thinking about PZTs some weeks ago as I didn´t think they would work due to the long build-up time of the pulses(even though there are devices I found than can withstand temp. of up to 1100K).

I have other ideas but my supervisor (who is a theoretician) was quite insistent that I use a PZT and I was quite insistent that it wouldn´t work.

:frown: There will have to be another tense meeting...
 
Is there perhaps some way that it can be done optically or accoustically? I don't know anything about it; just throwing out a thought. Something perhaps like having a standing air mass of known properties in the plume path, with a funnel or tube leading to a transducer to measure the pressure increase.
 
Thanks for the suggestion Danger, but unforunately that's not possible as the plume is being generated in a vacuum (you also have to consider the incredibly high temp. of the plasma).

I think I have found the solution in some electronics to control the period of the plasma pulses (and so use the PZT s but just at a much higher freq.).

But originally I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't wrong about the PZTs poor response at low frequencies... as I have another meeting tomorrow.

:approve:
 
Yeah, I guess that introducing an air mass would to some small degree compromise the integrity of your vacuum. :biggrin:
I didn't know that the pulse frequency could be adjusted. It seems that you've found a good solution. Good luck at the meeting. Keep us posted.
 
H_man said:
Thanks Enigma,

Yup, I can´t use a strain gauge as I am measuring the impulse from a plasma plume. The high temperatures would kill the gauge very quickly.

I stopped thinking about PZTs some weeks ago as I didn´t think they would work due to the long build-up time of the pulses(even though there are devices I found than can withstand temp. of up to 1100K).

IIRC, the high temperatures will depole the crystals pretty quickly. I'm actually kind of surprised that they're advertising 1100K.

Are there any magnetic properties of the plume you could utilize?

Could you draw a quick sketch of the proposed experimental setup?
 
The K-12 material in the table on their website is listed for applications up to around 1000K.

http://www.piezotechnologies.com/materialssheet.htm

I was pretty surprised myself

I have the data sheet for the material which does show how properties vary with temp. Although, unforunately it doesn't show the effect of repeated heating and cooling cycles.

My gut feeling is that if I am to use the PZT its going to have to be contained within some kind of cooling jacket, perhaps with water (in a sealed pipe) helping draw the heat away. Also... I won't be letting the plasma directly impinge on the crystal.

As for how the setup is going to look... I am fairly free to orientate things as I wish. As for hows its going to look :smile: , your guess is as good as mine.

As for magnetic properties of the plume... this wouldn't help an impulse measurement.

I'll keep you informed...:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi,
can I use peizoelectric sensors to obtain and record the low substrat vibrations? if ı use, how can ı do?
thanks in advance
 
  • #10
I'v ever one time saw one introducing article on the peizo sensors application from one web . It has a quite detailed data sheet on it ...Hv to recall the memory ...seems frequency decided the sense like that .
 
  • #11
nivalis said:
hi,
can I use peizoelectric sensors to obtain and record the low substrat vibrations? if ı use, how can ı do?
thanks in advance



YES . OFX U CAN . It is up the sensors u chose.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K