B Question re Webb telescope at L2

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Buzz Bloom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    L2 Telescope
AI Thread Summary
The James Webb Space Telescope will operate in a halo orbit around the L2 point, which is an unstable equilibrium. This orbit will have a radius of approximately 800,000 km and take about six months to complete. Since L2 lacks gravitational pull, the telescope will drift and requires station-keeping maneuvers to maintain its position, consuming about 2–4 m/s of its total propulsion budget. The observatory is equipped with two sets of thrusters to manage this propulsion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for the telescope's operational success.
Buzz Bloom
Gold Member
Messages
2,517
Reaction score
465
TL;DR Summary
The article https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/about/orbit.html describes the planned placing the Webb telescope in orbit near the L2 Lagrange point of the Earth-Sun system. But L2 is gravitationally unstable.
The diagram in the article seems to say that the Webb will orbit around the unstable L2 point. At any distance near L2 but not exactly at L2 the Webb will tend to move further from L2, unless Webb has an engine and fuel to maintain it in the special orbit. I was not able to find any description of such an engine, so I am asking the Physics Forums participants what they might know about this.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org

The telescope will circle about the L2 point in a halo orbit, which will be inclined with respect to the ecliptic, have a radius of approximately 800,000 km (500,000 mi), and take about half a year to complete.[30] Since L2 is just an equilibrium point with no gravitational pull, a halo orbit is not an orbit in the usual sense: the spacecraft is actually in orbit around the Sun, and the halo orbit can be thought of as controlled drifting to remain in the vicinity of the L2 point.[146] This requires some station-keeping: around 2–4 m/s per year[147] from the total budget of 150 m/s.[148] Two sets of thrusters constitute the observatory's propulsion system.[
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes hutchphd, pinball1970 and Buzz Bloom
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top