Question regarding Electrical conduction(Resistance)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sanosuke Sagara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating resistance in two scenarios involving carbon film. For part (a), the resistance between opposite edges of a carbon film is determined using its resistivity. In part (b), the challenge lies in finding the length of a cylindrical insulator rod with a carbon film that results in a specified resistance of 100 ohms. Clarification is provided that "curved surface" refers to the side of the cylinder, excluding the ends. The correct diameter for the rod is identified as 3.0 mm, not 3.0 m, and the same resistance formula applies to both questions, allowing for the calculation of length based on the known resistance.
Sanosuke Sagara
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
(a) Find the resistance between two opposite edge faces of a piece of square carbon film of thickness 5.0 x 10^-7 n,if the resistivity of carbon is 4.0 x 10^-5 ohm meter.

(b) A carbon film of the same thickness is formed on an insulator rod of diameter 3.0m.What is the length of the rod so that the carbon film on its curve surface has a resistance of 100 ohm ?

Question (a) and (b) is continuous and I have no problem with question (a).My problem is question (b) and I can't really understand with the question and I can't imagine out the figure.

I want to ask whether there is any relationship of answers in question (a) in solving the qiestion (b) and I really need someone to explain to me the phrase 'curve surface' .

Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this question and I really need explanation for this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of a cylinder, the curved surface is well, the surface that isn't the ends.

Could you not just use the formula, R = \frac{\rho l}{A} and solve for l? R is the resistance, \rho is the resistivity and A is the cross sectional area.
 
Solution and some suggestion to solve the question

I have try to solve this question for a long time and I really can't find the correct answer.I have my doubt,solution to the question in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this qustion.
 

Attachments

Sanosuke Sagara said:
I have try to solve this question for a long time and I really can't find the correct answer.I have my doubt,solution to the question in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this qustion.
Judging by your attached document, the correct diameter of the rod in part b) is 3.0 mm, rather than 3.0m. Using 3.0 mm the given answer is realized by following exactly the same approach I suggested in your previous problem. Find the resistance from one end to the other of a thin walled cylinder by finding the cross-sectional area of the cylinder walls, and the length of the cylinder. Here you know the resistance and must solve for the length.
 
Thanks for your help OlderDan and I really appreciate it because I have really understand with the question and thanks for your explanation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top