So, I was thinking about Euler's formula, and I noticed something interesting. Based on the fact that [tex]e^\frac{i\pi}{2} = 1 [/tex], it seems as though [tex]\frac{i\pi}{2} = 0[/tex]. However, this doesn't make any sense. Not only can I not see how this expression could possibly equal 0, but that would imply that [tex]i\pi = 0[/tex] which would in turn imply that [tex]e^{i\pi} = 1[/tex] when it, of course, is equal to -1. At the moment, I have only a very basic understanding of complex/imaginary numbers and their properties, but it seems to me that the implication here is that [tex]\ln(1)[/tex] is not uniquely equal to zero. Is there something I'm missing that shows that this is not the case? If I am correct in this conclusion, is this because of some property of imaginary numbers that I don't know about yet?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Question regarding imaginary numbers and euler's formula

Loading...

Similar Threads - Question regarding imaginary | Date |
---|---|

A Question regarding root of Bring quintic not expressible with radicals | Dec 2, 2016 |

Interesting question regarding Lie algebras | Sep 29, 2013 |

Quick question regarding isomorphic groups? | Sep 2, 2013 |

Question regarding Kronecker Delta | Aug 29, 2013 |

Question regarding cross products and determinants | Sep 11, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**