Question Regarding Momentum Lab

  • Thread starter Thread starter bleedblue1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab Momentum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the law of conservation of linear momentum in a physics lab involving two carts on a track. Participants question why scenarios involving two carts colliding or moving towards each other are not necessary for verifying momentum conservation. The consensus is that both conservation of momentum and conservation of energy are valid in all inertial frames, supported by the principles of Galilean Relativity. This understanding clarifies that momentum is relative and applicable in various collision scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear momentum and its conservation principles
  • Familiarity with Galilean Relativity and inertial frames
  • Basic knowledge of experimental physics and lab setups
  • Experience with data collection using sonar detectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Galilean Relativity in detail
  • Explore advanced topics in conservation laws in physics
  • Learn about collision types and their impact on momentum
  • Investigate the use of sonar technology in experimental physics
USEFUL FOR

Students in AP Physics, educators teaching momentum concepts, and anyone interested in experimental physics methodologies.

bleedblue1234
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We recently did a momentum lab in my AP Physics B class that involved a track with two carts. 1 of the carts was stationary on the track and the other was launched into it. We used sonar detectors at both ends of the tracks to find the velocity (and eventually calculate the momentum)...

My question is that on my lab I have a question that states: Why don't we need to take into account a case where the two carts would be rolling towards each other or the passive cart rams into the stationary (once active) cart to verify the law of conservation of linear momentum?

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it had something to do with velocities being relative, and thus momentums being relative, therefore it is true in all cases? I am just a little confused...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi bleedblue1234! :smile:
bleedblue1234 said:
… I have a question that states: Why don't we need to take into account a case where the two carts would be rolling towards each other or the passive cart rams into the stationary (once active) cart to verify the law of conservation of linear momentum?

I thought it had something to do with velocities being relative, and thus momentums being relative, therefore it is true in all cases? I am just a little confused...

Yes, I'm a little confused too …

it seems to be begging the question.

Anyway, both conservation of momentum and conservation of energy work equally well in any inertial frame …

in other words, Galilean Relativity applies to inertial frames.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K