Question Regarding Perception of Time

[Billiards1974]

First off, forgive me if I don't word this properly. I'm a furniture restorer by trade and have recently begun thinking about how everything works. Specifically, I have been thinking about the possibility of our perception of time and the actual flow of time.

From what I understand, Einstein theorized that time could flow in either direction. With that being said, is it theoretically possible that time is CURRENTLY flowing in a "backwards" direction but, our perception of it is actually "forward"?

Your answers will, I'm sure, spark additional questions from me.

Thanks,
Billiards1974

 

[Dale]

From what I understand, Einstein theorized that time could flow in either direction.

Hi Billiards 1974, welcome to PF!

I don't think that Einstein ever theorized that. Do you have a specific quote or source you are referring to?

The laws of physics appear to be time-reverse symmetric for the most part. Perhaps that is what you are discussing, but I don't recall any comments by Einstein along those lines.

 

[Billiards1974]

Sorry, about bringing Einstein into this... It is theoretically possible for time to flow in either direction, isn't it?

My question is, if it is possible for time to flow in either direction, could it be that time actually is flowing in the direction opposite from what we perceive? And, if time, in fact, could be flowing in that direction, can it be mathematically expressed?

 

[nitsuj]

The symmetry Dalespam mentions is literal, no different than the symmetry of your reflection in a mirror.

A classic "visual" for this is to imagine a video recording playing in forward or reverse. In both cases the mechanical physics is the exact same.

What is apparently directional and closely correlated with time is entropy. However these are two distinct concepts. In other words from a purely physical mechanics perspective there is no "direction" to time.

What that means with respect to your question "possible for time to flow in either direction, isn't it?" There is no direction or "flow" of time, therefore it doesn't makes sense to ask if it can flow in either direction. Saying it's symmetric is descriptive and accurate, either "side" of that symmetry is not forward or backward, it's just equal but opposite.

It does make sense to ask your question about entropy, however I know little to nothing about entropy, plus it's not the right sub-forum for such a topic.

 

[Dale]

Sorry, about bringing Einstein into this... It is theoretically possible for time to flow in either direction, isn't it?

My question is, if it is possible for time to flow in either direction, could it be that time actually is flowing in the direction opposite from what we perceive? And, if time, in fact, could be flowing in that direction, can it be mathematically expressed?

So, scientifically the concept you are referring to is called T-symmetry. The Wikipedia page on T-symmetry used to be pretty good, but apparently now it has some sort of certificate errors:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-symmetry

Mathematically, you would express it as t \mapsto -t. You can then apply that mapping to different laws of physics and see what would happen. For example, Newton's 2nd law:

f=m a = m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}
t \mapsto -t
f = m \frac{d^2x}{d(-t)^2} = m \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = ma

So Newton's 2nd law is unchanged under time reversal. The same thing is true for all of the fundamental laws except for the weak nuclear force. Also, even with symmetric laws, if you have certain initial conditions you can get asymmetry as well, such as the big bang and the second law of thermodynamics.

 

[Stricklandjr]

Moving in time

First off, forgive me if I don't word this properly. I'm a furniture restorer by trade and have recently begun thinking about how everything works. Specifically, I have been thinking about the possibility of our perception of time and the actual flow of time.

From what I understand, Einstein theorized that time could flow in either direction. With that being said, is it theoretically possible that time is CURRENTLY flowing in a "backwards" direction but, our perception of it is actually "forward"?

Your answers will, I'm sure, spark additional questions from me.

Thanks,
Billiards1974

Mr. Billiards1974 in another thread Dr. Donis showed me that one way of looking at it is to imagine the universe is 4 dimensional and that you are a 4 dimensional world tube and that you 3 dimensional world right now is just a slice of the 4 dimensional universe. It's just like when you do drafting and take a cross section and label it Sec A-A. So then when you think you just experience one 3 dimensional slice at a time and your thinking sees one slice after the other going forward along your world tube as time passes so time does not move forward or backward because your mind just does the moving when it experiences one slice after another. So going backward in time would mean that your mind experienced one slice after another going in the opposite direction along your world tube. Dr. Donis said that the world tube doesn't move because it is 4 dimensional all there at once. But I bet there is no way of knowing whether your mind could move in the opposite direction along your world tube because I don't think anybody knows why your mind experiences one slice after another moving along your world tube at the speed of light in the first place. I don't know much more about relativity yet but am trying to learn just like you.

 

[Billiards1974]

Mr. Billiards1974 in another thread Dr. Donis showed me that one way of looking at it is to imagine the universe is 4 dimensional and that you are a 4 dimensional world tube and that you 3 dimensional world right now is just a slice of the 4 dimensional universe. It's just like when you do drafting and take a cross section and label it Sec A-A. So then when you think you just experience one 3 dimensional slice at a time and your thinking sees one slice after the other going forward along your world tube as time passes so time does not move forward or backward because your mind just does the moving when it experiences one slice after another. So going backward in time would mean that your mind experienced one slice after another going in the opposite direction along your world tube. Dr. Donis said that the world tube doesn't move because it is 4 dimensional all there at once. But I bet there is no way of knowing whether your mind could move in the opposite direction along your world tube because I don't think anybody knows why your mind experiences one slice after another moving along your world tube at the speed of light in the first place. I don't know much more about relativity yet but am trying to learn just like you.

I'm REALLY trying to stay away from the philosophical. But, this would explain our perpetual state of "now".

 

[Stricklandjr]

I'm REALLY trying to stay away from the philosophical. But, this would explain our perpetual state of "now".

It is not philosophy if it is correct physics. Mr. TheBC believes it is true physics and he gave sayings of Einstein where he said that the universe is 4 dimensional and Einstein is the greatest physicist to ever live and I don't think he would make a saying of such big importance if it was not good physics since he gave his whole life to physics.

 

[Billiards1974]

So Newton's 2nd law is unchanged under time reversal. The same thing is true for all of the fundamental laws except for the weak nuclear force. Also, even with symmetric laws, if you have certain initial conditions you can get asymmetry as well, such as the big bang and the second law of thermodynamics.

How is the law different for weak nuclear force? (Again, I am a COMPLETE novice here.)

 

[Dale]

Einstein is the greatest physicist to ever live and I don't think he would make a saying of such big importance if it was not good physics

This is a non sequiter. Even the greatest physicist to ever live is allowed to make philosophical statements, as well as order lunch, complain about their neighbors, whisper romantic nothings, and any other thing he might want say. Simply because a physicist says it doesn't make it physics.

 

[Dale]

How is the law different for weak nuclear force? (Again, I am a COMPLETE novice here.)

Basically, the time asymmetry of the weak interaction (also called CP violation) allows quarks to change their flavors in ways that wouldn't happen the same if time were reversed.

 

[dayalanand roy]

Dear Billiards
Though I am not a physicist, I have tried to understand time. Time does not flow at all. So no question of flowing in any direction. Things flow, ie, change/move as per thermodynamics or the forces acting on them. In order to measure their rate of change/motion, we apply a parameter of time. But this 'time' too, as Einstein suggested, is not absolute.
Since we see mostly irreversible changes in nature, like our kids growing, our aging, breaking of a cup etc, we believe in a flowing- and in one direction only, time. But what about melting of an ice cube into water and then again freezing back to ice. Does time flow here in a reverse direction here? No.
regards
Dayalanand