Question regarding Schroedinger's Equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Domnu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the compatibility of the Hamiltonian operator (\hat{H}) and the momentum operator (\hat{p}) in the context of Schrödinger's Equation. Participants explore whether these operators can be observed simultaneously and the implications of their commutation relations, particularly in different physical scenarios such as relativistic quantum mechanics and interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether \hat{H} and \hat{p} are compatible, suggesting that if they commute, total energy and momentum can be observed simultaneously, contingent on knowing the mass of the system.
  • Another participant challenges the initial claim, pointing out a potential misunderstanding regarding the eigenvalues of the energy and momentum operators, noting that they have the same set of eigenkets but different eigenvalues.
  • Some participants assert that the operators can be measured simultaneously, citing their commutativity and shared eigenkets, while also emphasizing the distinction between their eigenvalues.
  • A participant introduces the perspective from relativistic quantum mechanics, stating that in this framework, \hat{H} is related to the four-momentum and that all components commute, but this is limited to one-particle states.
  • Another participant clarifies that \hat{p} is defined differently and that the operators do not commute in the presence of spatial interactions, indicating that they share eigenstates only for free particles or massless particles under specific conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the compatibility of \hat{H} and \hat{p}, with some asserting they can be simultaneously measured while others highlight conditions under which they do not commute. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these operators in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the operators' eigenvalues and the conditions under which they commute, particularly in the presence of interactions or in multi-particle systems.

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question regarding Schroedinger's Equation... since we have [tex]\hat{H} \psi = \hat{p} \psi = E \psi[/tex], does this mean that the operators [tex]\hat{H}[/tex] and [tex]\hat{p}[/tex] are compatible? In other words, does this mean that the operators commute and that the total energy and momentum of the particle system can be observed simultaneously? This would make sense, assuming we knew the mass of the system...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Domnu said:
Just a quick question regarding Schroedinger's Equation... since we have [tex]\hat{H} \psi = \hat{p} \psi = E \psi[/tex],
Woa there. Where did you get the idea that this was true? As you wrote it you have the energy eigenvalues being the same as the momentum eigenvalues. It is true that the energy operator and the momentum operator have the same set of eigenkets and, as I recall (I'll have to double check to make sure) for that reason these two operators commute.

Pete
 
Um, well, you know that Schroedinger's time dependent equation is just

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 \psi + V \psi = i \hbar \frac{d \psi}{dt}[/tex]

and that

[tex]\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2+ V[/tex],
[tex]\hat{p} = i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}[/tex].

So, you know that they can simultaneously be measured (they have the same set of eigenkets, and they are thus commutative... so they are measurable at the same time?)
 
Last edited:
No, [itex]p=-i\hbar\nabla[/itex]. The operator you call p is actually H, written in an alternative form.
 
One answer to your original question is that in relativistic quantum mechanics, H is actually the 0th component of the four-momentum. All the components commute with each other, [itex][P^\mu,P^\nu]=0[/itex]. Also, the operator [itex]P^2=-H^2+\vec P^2[/itex] commutes with all of the generators of (inhomogeneous) Lorentz transformations (momentum, spin and boost operators), which means that all the other inertial observers will agree with you about its value. The value is written as [itex]-m^2[/itex], and m is not surprisingly called the mass.

I should add that the above is only true when we're dealing with a Hilbert space of one-particle states. It obviously isn't true when our state vectors represent some complicated multi-particle system with interactions.
 
Last edited:
Domnu said:
Um, well, you know that Schroedinger's time dependent equation is just

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2 \psi + V \psi = i \hbar \frac{d \psi}{dt}[/tex]

and that

[tex]\hat{H} = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla^2+ V[/tex],
[tex]\hat{p} = i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}[/tex].

So, you know that they can simultaneously be measured (they have the same set of eigenkets, and they are thus commutative... so they are measurable at the same time?)
Yes. But you have it written as having the same eigenvalues, which they don't. The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian operator are different than the eigenvalues of the momentum operator even though the eigenket is the same. I.e.

[tex]\hat{H} \psi = E \psi[/tex]

[tex]\hat{p} \psi = p \psi[/tex]
 
p and H do not commute if there is a spatial interaction -- then, dp/dt=F = - grad(V). For a free particle, H and p do commute, thus they share eigenstates, as do any set of commuting operators. They share common eigenvalues only for massless particles, and then only for the magnitude of p.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K