Question related to IID process

  • Thread starter Shloa4
  • Start date
  • #1
15
0
Hi.
I have a question about and IID process (attached). I'll be happy if someone could help me understnad it better.
Thanks in advance :shy:
 

Attachments

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
7,898
461
The statement is about the sum. The distribution being the product of individual distributions has nothing to do with sum or product.
 
  • #3
chiro
Science Advisor
4,790
132
Hi.
I have a question about and IID process (attached). I'll be happy if someone could help me understnad it better.
Thanks in advance :shy:
Are you familiar with the convolution theorem for sums of IID random variables?

It might be wise to get a book on applied probability and then look at the convolution theorem for the sum of two IID random variables where the author proves that the CDF is the convolution (you can differentiate to get the PDF).
 
  • #4
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
7,569
1,465
Shloa4,

If the meaning of the question is clear to you, you should write it out in your own words. I don't think the document is clear.

It says "Let [itex] X_n = X(n) (n = 1,2,3...) [/itex] be an independent identically distributed (IID), discrete-time random process".

I don't understand why there is subscript on [itex] X_n [/itex]. I think there is one random process (which I would have called [itex] X[/itex] , with no subscript) and [itex] X_n = X[n] [/itex] is the random variable associated with time [itex] n [/itex]. (A "stochastic process" is an indexed collection of random variables.)

Then document defines a process [itex] S_m [/itex] by [itex] S_m = \sum_{n=1}^m X_n [/itex].

Then the document asks for the "common PDF" [itex] f_{X_1,X_2...X_n}(x_1,x_2,..x_n; t_1,t_2,...t_n) [/itex]

Is "common PDF" supposed to mean the joint probability density of the vector of random variables [itex] (X_1,X2,...X_n) [/itex] ? If so, I don't see that this question has anything to do with the process [itex] S_m [/itex].

The answer is given as [itex] \sum_{n=1}^m f_{X_n}(x_n,t_n) [/itex]

So how did the subscript [itex] m [/itex] get into that formula?
 

Related Threads on Question related to IID process

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Top