Question ' write the elements of set A'

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on defining the elements of set A based on the mathematical expression $$A=\{x \mid x \in \mathbb Z^+, z > x - 3 \}$$. Participants clarify that if z is a positive integer greater than x - 3, the elements of A can be expressed as the integers from 1 to z + 2. The conversation highlights the importance of precise problem statements in mathematics, as ambiguity can lead to confusion regarding the definition of the set.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and set builder notation
  • Familiarity with positive integers and the notation $\mathbb Z^+$
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities and their implications in set definitions
  • Experience with mathematical problem-solving and clarification techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of set builder notation in depth
  • Learn about the properties of positive integers and their applications
  • Explore common pitfalls in mathematical problem statements and how to address them
  • Review examples of defining sets based on inequalities and conditions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone involved in mathematical problem-solving or teaching set theory concepts.

mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
Cam_Scanner_New_Document_30_e30820120d30_P40_T40_Q00.jpg


Any ideas on how to begin

Many thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
Any ideas on how to begin

Many thanks :)

Hi mathlearn! (Smile)

To be honest, that looks like some kind of typo in the problem statement.If we read it like:
$$A=\{x \mid x \in \mathbb Z^+, \mathbb Z > x - 3 \}$$
then it would or should mean that $x-3$ is smaller than any element of $\mathbb Z$, which is never the case.
In that case $A$ is the empty set ($\varnothing$).Alternatively, if we read it as:
$$A=\{x \mid x \in \mathbb Z^+, z > x - 3 \}$$
where $z$ is some number that is presumably in $\mathbb Z^+$, then we have $0<x < z+3$.
So in that case the elements of $A$ are $1, 2, ..., z+2$.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi mathlearn! (Smile)

To be honest, that looks like some kind of typo in the problem statement.Alternatively, if we read it as:
$$A=\{x \mid x \in \mathbb Z^+, z > x - 3 \}$$
where $z$ is some number that is presumably in $\mathbb Z^+$, then we have $0<x < z+3$.
So in that case the elements of $A$ are $1, 2, ..., z+2$.

Reading it in Set builder method

"The set of all x such that x is a positive integer, where z is some number positive number greater that x - 3"

so z(a positive integer,this case 1)> 1-3 = -2-------------------(✖ not a positive integer)
z(a positive integer,this case 2)> 2-3 = -1-------------------(✖ not a positive integer)
z(a positive integer,this case 3)> 3-3 = 0-------------------(✖ neither negative nor positive)
z(a positive integer,this case 4)> 4-3 = 1-------------------(✔ a positive integer)
z(a positive integer, this case 5)> 5-3 = 2-------------------(✔ a positive integer)

and so on like I like Serena ; the numbers are 1,2,3,4,5... on

Representing in a number line,

Capturenumberline.png


OR

A=$\left\{1,2,3,4,5,6,...\right\}$

Correct I guess?

Many Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
I like Serena said:
Alternatively, if we read it as:
$$A=\{x \mid x \in \mathbb Z^+, z > x - 3 \}$$
where $z$ is some number that is presumably in $\mathbb Z^+$, then we have $0<x < z+3$.
So in that case the elements of $A$ are $1, 2, ..., z+2$.

mathlearn said:
Reading it in Set builder method

"The set of all x such that x is a positive integer, where z is some number positive number greater that x - 3"
Even though ILS said that $z$ is presumably in $\mathbb Z^+$, one cannot be certain this is the case. I recommend contacting the problem author and clarifying the problem statement. I don't have high confidence in a problem statement that uses the euro symbol instead of $\in$ and uses the same symbol $Z$ for a set and an individual number.

mathlearn said:
so z(a positive integer,this case 1)> 1-3 = -2-------------------(✖ not a positive integer)
z(a positive integer,this case 2)> 2-3 = -1-------------------(✖ not a positive integer)
z(a positive integer,this case 3)> 3-3 = 0-------------------(✖ neither negative nor positive)
z(a positive integer,this case 4)> 4-3 = 1-------------------(✔ a positive integer)
z(a positive integer, this case 5)> 5-3 = 2-------------------(✔ a positive integer)

and so on like I like Serena ; the numbers are 1,2,3,4,5... on
The set consists not of $z$s, but of $x$s. The number $z$ has to be given up front, before we consider the definition of set $A$. As ILS wrote, once $z$ is given, $A=\{1,2,\dots,z+2\}$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K