Questions about 3 colliding object. Can i get some help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Botond
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three point-like objects in space with specified masses and initial conditions, where gravitational forces cause them to move and collide. The questions focus on the distance covered until they meet and the time until collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the paths taken by the objects, questioning the initial conditions and the implications of relative velocities. There are attempts to visualize the motion and force vectors involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the motion and the forces acting on the objects. Some guidance has been offered regarding the initial force vectors and the implications of mass on trajectory, but no consensus has been reached on the exact paths or meeting point of the objects.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem due to the non-constant forces and the relative motion of the objects, which may affect their trajectories. There is also mention of the need for a clearer understanding of the initial setup and assumptions.

Botond
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Member warned about posting without the template and with no effort shown
The exercise is:

There are three point-like objects in space - far from any other objects - such that their initial velocities are zero, and the distance between any two is the same d. Two of the objects have the same mass of m, and the mass of the third one is 2m. Due to the gravitational force the objects begin to move and they collide with each other.

a) How much distance do they cover until they meet?

b) How much time elapses until the collision of the objects?

I tried to use F=ma, F=G*m1*m2*1/r2, and a=d2x/dt2 to get the time-distance function, but i could't do anything with the sin(alpha). The other problem is i can't find out the lane of the objects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any sense of the KIND of paths each of the three would take? Can you draw a rough diagram of what the 3 paths would look like from start to collision?

Just as a side note, it is incorrect to say "such that their initial velocities are zero". To be correct, you have to say "such that their initial velocities are zero RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER". If you think this is just semantics, then you misunderstand the nature of motion.
 
phinds said:
Do you have any sense of the KIND of paths each of the three would take? Can you draw a rough diagram of what the 3 paths would look like from start to collision?

Just as a side note, it is incorrect to say "such that their initial velocities are zero". To be correct, you have to say "such that their initial velocities are zero RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER". If you think this is just semantics, then you misunderstand the nature of motion.
I know that the 2m mass will go straight, but i don't knoe the 2 other's path.
 
Botond said:
I know that the 2m mass will go straight, but i don't knoe the 2 other's path.
Yes, and that's a good start. Think about where they start out towards and where they end up at. That will tell you whether or not they go straight. Can you draw the initial force vectors? That will give you a good clue.
 
phinds said:
Yes, and that's a good start. Think about where they start out towards and where they end up at. That will tell you whether or not they go straight. Can you draw the initial force vectors? That will give you a good clue.
But i don't know where they will meet. And the forces aren't constant, so i think them flow can be curve.
 
Botond said:
But i don't know where they will meet. And the forces aren't constant, so i think them flow can be curve.
I agree. I think the heavy one travels in a straight line but the other two curve just a bit. I have not done any math to back this up so it could be wrong. I'm not sure what you point is about "the forces aren't constant". Of course they aren't constant, but that doesn't really seem to be the question, or to solve the issue of their trajectories. The point is that the heavy one is traveling along the line of motion of the center of gravity of the three (and so will continue in a straight line) but the other two are not and so, I think, will not stay on a straight line.

It may be that the center of gravity of the 3 bodies does not change as they move, in which case out belief about the two curved paths will be wrong. As I said, I haven't done any math on this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K