Questions about the Velocity of Light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Velocity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of light, specifically its velocity and the implications of measuring it in hypothetical scenarios devoid of any reference points. Participants explore theoretical questions about light's behavior in a universe with no matter or observers, as well as the philosophical aspects of such thought experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the speed of light can be measured in a universe with no reference points, asking if light always moves at "C" and whether it can exist without motion.
  • Another participant asserts that discussions about light often assume a local observer's perspective and mentions specific phenomena like the Shapiro effect and light's speed in different mediums.
  • A participant challenges the relevance of thought experiments that lack logical premises, suggesting that such questions may be unanswerable.
  • Some participants express frustration with perceived dismissiveness towards the original poster's questions, emphasizing the need for respectful discourse and informed questioning.
  • There are comments about the importance of engaging with existing discussions and resources before asking questions in the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the validity and relevance of the original questions posed. Some participants defend the philosophical nature of the inquiries, while others criticize them as lacking substance or clarity. Overall, there is no consensus on the appropriateness of the questions or the responses they elicited.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing opinions on the necessity and validity of thought experiments in physics, with some arguing that they can lead to unanswerable questions. There is also a noted tension between the desire for thorough explanations and the expectation of prior research by the original poster.

Xray
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
It seems that wherever I go thoughout the web where people are discussing Physics in general and the velocity of light in particular, they seem to always assume that the light they are referring to is relative to an observer on the Earth. But what happens if there were no Earth, and no Sun, and no planets, and no Stars, and no Big Macs, and no... well, you get my point. Imagine a universe where there is absolutely nothing else except a lonely bundle of photons. Since there is nothing else to reference the light to, how could we know how fast it is moving, and in what direction (ignore the fact that "we" are measuring the light without existing in the same universe along with the light. After all, this is just a thought experiment!)? Does light always move at "C" even if there were nothing else to reference it to? Another question is, does light always have to be moving? And if so, then WHY? Does it continue moving forever, or does it eventually lose all of its energy and finally come to rest? could light ever exist without motion?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xray said:
It seems that wherever I go thoughout the web where people are discussing Physics in general and the velocity of light in particular, they seem to always assume that the light they are referring to is relative to an observer on the Earth.
No they don't!
They refer to the speed of light in the local space where the light is and in a vacuum.

You should find plenty if discussion how light wrt to us on Earth goes slow.
Inside glass for one, and during the Shapiro effect where photons (radar) in vacuum but near the sun appears to be slower that c wrt to earth, but exactly c wrt to the space it is in near the sun. Keep looking, those discussions are not hard to find.
 
RandallB said:
Keep looking, those discussions are not hard to find.

Well, that's why I came here... to get my questions answered. If people in every forum that I go to pass the buck by telling me to "keep looking" then I may not get my questions answered for a long time. I hope some very smart people in THIS forum will be kind enough to answer my questions.

Anyone else care to chime in?
 
Xray said:
Imagine a universe where there is absolutely nothing else except a lonely bundle of photons.
Imagine a universe where there is absolutely nothing, not even a single photon. What would be the speed of light there? And even more important, who cares? Seriously: Physics is about describing our universe.
Xray said:
Since there is nothing else to reference the light to, how could we know how fast it is moving, and in what direction (ignore the fact that "we" are measuring the light without existing in the same universe along with the light.
You are asking: How to measure the speed of light, while ignoring that we are measuring it?
Xray said:
WHY?
Physics is about "HOW?" not "WHY?".
 
A.T. said:
Imagine a universe where there is absolutely nothing, not even a single photon. What would be the speed of light there? And even more important, who cares? Seriously: Physics is about describing our universe.

You are asking: How to measure the speed of light, while ignoring that we are measuring it?
Physics is about "HOW?" not "WHY?".

Thanks for your reply! I guess I must have asked some silly questions. But that's okay... if my questions don't make sense, or are not worthy of being answered, then I really do appreciate it when people tell me so. That's how I learn!
 
Xray said:
Well, that's why I came here... to get my questions answered. If people in every forum that I go to pass the buck by telling me to "keep looking" then I may not get my questions answered for a long time. I hope some very smart people in THIS forum will be kind enough to answer my questions.
You need to be smart enough to see an answer when you get one.
Don’t expect spoon fed answers without even starting with a rational question.
Frankly I do not believe you when your claim “wherever I go throughout the web” you actually really did any looking there – just where did you find folks claiming light is always measured “relative to an observer on the Earth”.

And to correct your misconception you don’t even take the effort to search on Shapiro Effect or speed of light in glass. Instead you want someone on here to write something up on the subject for you to read. Do a little of the work yourself.

Your new here OK.
But the forum does not need uninformed nonsense questions.
If you want to make good use of the time the Mentors and others put in on these forums show them all a bit of respect.
Use the search function at the top of the page. Read and review at least a few threads in your interest to see how to ask informed questions>
Plus get yourself at least a little informed about what you want to discuss.
You do not have to start a thread - better to join in on one where you need help on something specific.
 
Xray said:
Imagine a universe where there is absolutely nothing else except a lonely bundle of photons. Since there is nothing else to reference the light to, how could we know how fast it is moving, and in what direction (ignore the fact that "we" are measuring the light without existing in the same universe along with the light. After all, this is just a thought experiment!)?
Even thought experiments cannot produce logical results from illogical premises. I am sorry, but your question is unanswerable.

There is https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=279798" pages:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html"
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/measure_c.html"
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/fast_light.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Xray said:
I guess I must have asked some silly questions.
The political correct term for "silly" is "philosophical". Sounds much better :wink:
 
RandallB said:
You need to be smart enough to see an answer when you get one.
Don’t expect spoon fed answers without even starting with a rational question.
Frankly I do not believe you when your claim “wherever I go throughout the web” you actually really did any looking there – just where did you find folks claiming light is always measured “relative to an observer on the Earth”.

And to correct your misconception you don’t even take the effort to search on Shapiro Effect or speed of light in glass. Instead you want someone on here to write something up on the subject for you to read. Do a little of the work yourself.

Your new here OK.
But the forum does not need uninformed nonsense questions.
If you want to make good use of the time the Mentors and others put in on these forums show them all a bit of respect.
Use the search function at the top of the page. Read and review at least a few threads in your interest to see how to ask informed questions>
Plus get yourself at least a little informed about what you want to discuss.
You do not have to start a thread - better to join in on one where you need help on something specific.


Maybe you are having a bad day, or maybe you talk to everyone that way, but I do not appreciate your arrogant, unfriendly attitude. Is that the way you treat all new people who come to this forum looking for answers? Maybe my questions aren't quite up to the university level that you require, but you need not talk down to people because their questions do not meet your specifications as "good questions". People like you make me PUKE.
 
  • #10
DaleSpam said:
Even thought experiments cannot produce logical results from illogical premises. I am sorry, but your question is unanswerable.

Thank you for your reply. {edit out unnecessary comments.}

Regards
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K