Undergrad Questions about the Voyager spacecraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter abdossamad2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacecraft Voyager
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Voyager spacecraft, while currently safe from celestial collisions, faces challenges due to fuel limitations that restrict acceleration in deep space. Alternatives like ion drives are being explored, which offer higher fuel efficiency but low thrust, making them impractical for launch from Earth. The discussion highlights that increasing spacecraft speed significantly requires exponentially more fuel, complicating design and engineering. NASA is actively researching advanced propulsion systems to enhance spacecraft performance, including the potential for photon rockets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spacecraft propulsion systems, including ion drives and chemical rockets.
  • Familiarity with gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy in orbital mechanics.
  • Knowledge of NASA's current missions and propulsion research initiatives.
  • Basic principles of mass reduction mechanisms in propulsion systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research NASA's advancements in ion propulsion technology.
  • Study the mechanics of gravitational assists and their application in space missions.
  • Explore the concept of photon rockets and their potential advantages over traditional propulsion.
  • Investigate the engineering challenges of increasing spacecraft speed and fuel efficiency.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, astrophysicists, and space enthusiasts interested in spacecraft design, propulsion technologies, and the future of interstellar travel will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
abdossamad2003 said:
To travel to interstellar space requires the final speed and highest speed without return and slow down.
I read this and was planning a reply. A dismissive polite reply has been made, pointing out that it's largely nonsense except for as an incremental step (one further than Voyager). But a very useful mission could be throwaway. It would need a massive robot laboratory and a seriously big transmitter to return a vast amount of data - and a selfie with our first extra-terrestrial.
Missions within the Solar System would benefit from a return trip - not just with humans but with retrieved material. I don't really subscribe to the urgency of sending humans everywhere. From the high success rates of modern robot systems, I have to conclude that they are far far better value. Also they don't have the public trauma when space travellers die in service; robot fails don't have to lead to a halt in the flow of finance for space investigations.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
phyzguy said:
How would you propose to launch a spacecraft weighing 10^9 kg into space?
I'm more impressed with a mass ratio of 1 to 1000000.

Also even if we assume no payload, hand wave away the mass of the structure and tanks and use all the dry mass for ion engines and electricity generation that will be one amazingly slow accelerating rocket.
 
  • #33
"Ah, but we're going at night!"
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K