Questions on a modern theory of the differential from a gem of an old Calc text

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the multivariable calculus text "Modern Multidimensional Calculus" by M. E. Munroe, which presents a unique approach to variables and differentials, treating them as mappings rather than mere variables. The text distinguishes between traditional functions and mappings, asserting that in modern differential theory, recognizing x and y as mappings is essential. A participant, Ron Gove, shares his experience learning from this text and expresses interest in discussing its concepts further, particularly the definition of the differential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with differential geometry principles
  • Knowledge of function notation and mappings
  • Basic comprehension of calculus differentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of mappings in differential geometry
  • Study the definition of differentials in advanced calculus texts
  • Explore the historical context of "Modern Multidimensional Calculus" by M. E. Munroe
  • Investigate the implications of treating variables as mappings in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in advanced calculus concepts, particularly those exploring the intersection of calculus and differential geometry.

MJC684
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Questions on a "modern" theory of the differential from a gem of an old Calc text

I discovered a gem of an multivariable calculus text from the 60s called "Modern Multidimensional Calculus" by M. E. Munroe. First off is anyone familiar with this text by any chance? It presents variables and differentials in way that I have never seen before and was wondering if this how these concepts are defined in Differential Geometry perhaps.

The variables x and y are treated not simply as variables but as mappings. The mapping x and the mapping y map points in the plane to their abscissas and ordinates respectively. So x is x(p) and y is y(p). It then distinquishes these coordinate mappings from the type that is usually presented in elementary calculus that of f(x). A "function" in this text is a mapping that maps numbers into numbers as opposed to points, (physical/geometrical objects) to numbers. In this way f(x) is actually f[x(p)]. It claims that in the modern theory of the differential it is absolutely essential to recognize x and y as mappings themselves.

The text says things that I am not 100% sure that I'm understanding completely like " Should the equation y = F[x(p)] be taken by itself and regarded as an assertion that y and F[x(p)] are two symbols for the same mapping? Unfortunately the answer is no in analytic geometry and yes in calculus"

Why is that?

The way the differential of x and y is defined is just as interesting and new to me as well. It makes a lot more sense than all the double talk concerning differentials and increments in the usual calculus texts. I won't get into the definition it gives for the differential just yet unless someone who is qualified takes an interest in this posting.

My question is has anyone seen this type treatment of calculus before? Is this perhaps the way the x and y variables are treated in more advanced mathematics like Diff Geometry or just this authors own special treatment of the subject? worth studying despite the ill be covering the same material next semester in the traditional way?

If anyone is interested ill get into the differential definition. Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org


MJC684 said:
I discovered a gem of an multivariable calculus text from the 60s called "Modern Multidimensional Calculus" by M. E. Munroe. First off is anyone familiar with this text by any chance? It presents variables and differentials in way that I have never seen before and was wondering if this how these concepts are defined in Differential Geometry perhaps.

The variables x and y are treated not simply as variables but as mappings. The mapping x and the mapping y map points in the plane to their abscissas and ordinates respectively. So x is x(p) and y is y(p). It then distinquishes these coordinate mappings from the type that is usually presented in elementary calculus that of f(x). A "function" in this text is a mapping that maps numbers into numbers as opposed to points, (physical/geometrical objects) to numbers. In this way f(x) is actually f[x(p)]. It claims that in the modern theory of the differential it is absolutely essential to recognize x and y as mappings themselves.

The text says things that I am not 100% sure that I'm understanding completely like " Should the equation y = F[x(p)] be taken by itself and regarded as an assertion that y and F[x(p)] are two symbols for the same mapping? Unfortunately the answer is no in analytic geometry and yes in calculus"

Why is that?

The way the differential of x and y is defined is just as interesting and new to me as well. It makes a lot more sense than all the double talk concerning differentials and increments in the usual calculus texts. I won't get into the definition it gives for the differential just yet unless someone who is qualified takes an interest in this posting.

My question is has anyone seen this type treatment of calculus before? Is this perhaps the way the x and y variables are treated in more advanced mathematics like Diff Geometry or just this authors own special treatment of the subject? worth studying despite the ill be covering the same material next semester in the traditional way?

If anyone is interested ill get into the differential definition. Thanks in advance

I learned multidimensional calculus from this text (a preprint actually I believe) from Prof Munroe himself at UNH in 1962/63. I just started to reread the book (trying to keep my 70 year-old brain working as much as possible.) if you still are interested in this text i would be pleased to discuss topics with you.
Ron Gove
PhD Math, Brandeis University, 1972
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K