Quick Check for Relativity HW, rocket passing by space station

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in the context of special relativity, specifically involving Lorentz transformations as applied to events related to a rocket passing by a space station. Participants are exploring the relationships between space and time coordinates in different reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply Lorentz transformations to determine the coordinates of events in different frames. Questions arise regarding the correctness of space and time coordinates, particularly concerning the position of the tail of the ship and the interpretation of time in relation to classical mechanics.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some participants express uncertainty about their calculations and seek to reconcile their findings with physical intuition. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in understanding the implications of the Lorentz transformations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of proper length and relative motion, as well as the potential confusion arising from classical interpretations of relativistic phenomena. There is an acknowledgment of the need for careful consideration of the transformations and their physical meanings.

PhDeezNutz
Messages
853
Reaction score
561
Homework Statement
Part (C), The book contends ##\gamma## should be in the denominator where as I think it should be in the numerator$$
Relevant Equations
The Lorentz Transform (see below)
Image 4-26-20 at 4.27 PM.jpg


Image 4-26-20 at 4.27 PM (1).jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhDeezNutz said:
1587937508507.png
Check this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
TSny said:
Check this.

Alright, I think I got it and it doesn't make the least bit of sense but here we go. I want to practice using Lorentz Transforms instead of time dilation and length contraction formulas.

Event 1: is when ##A'## crosses ##A##. The coordinates for these in the station frame and ship frame are ##S_1 = \left( 0,0\right)## and ##S'_1 = \left(0,0\right)## respectively.

Event 2: is when ##B'## crosses ##A##. The coordinates for these in the station frame and ship frame are ##S_2 = \left( 0,t_2\right)## and ##S'_2 = \left(-\gamma v t_2,\gamma t_2\right)## respectively where ##S'_2## is found by Lorentz Transforming ##S_2## according to

##x' = \gamma x - \gamma v t##

##t' = - \frac{\gamma v}{c^2} + \gamma t##

But ##\gamma t_2 = \frac{l_0}{v}##. So, therefore ##t_2 = \frac{l_0}{\gamma v}##.

I actually think this is wrong since I made the same mistake that you warned me about but I somehow got the right answer. I can't physically reconcile the last step, all I know is that it gets me the right answer.
 
It should be easy to write down the space and time coordinates for the second event in the primed frame. They are easily expressed in terms of ##l_0## and ##v##. In your first post, you have the correct expression for the time coordinate of this event in the primed frame. But, you mistakenly wrote the space coordinate as ##0##. What is the space coordinate of the tail of the ship in the primed frame (at any time)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
TSny said:
It should be easy to write down the space and time coordinates for the second event in the primed frame. They are easily expressed in terms of ##l_0## and ##v##. In your first post, you have the correct expression for the time coordinate of this event in the primed frame. But, you mistakenly wrote the space coordinate as ##0##. What is the space coordinate of the tail of the ship in the primed frame (at any time)?

##- l_0##? I say minus because in my mind it's to the left of the origin of ##S'##.
 
PhDeezNutz said:
##- l_0##? I say minus because in my mind it's to the left of the origin of ##S'##.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
TSny said:
Yes.

I'm afraid I don't follow when I take the event ##S'_{B'\:crosses\:A} = \left( -l_0, \frac{l_0}{v}\right)## and transform it to ##S## I get ##S_{B'\:crosses\:A} = \left( -\gamma l_0 - \gamma l_0, -\frac{\gamma v}{c^2}\left( \frac{l_0}{v}\right) + \frac{\gamma l_0}{v}\right) = \left( 0, \frac{\gamma v}{c^2}\left( \frac{l_0}{v}\right) + \frac{\gamma l_0}{v} \right) ##, but the time coordinate of this event in ##S## isn't ##\frac{l_0}{\gamma v} ## (The answer that the book gets).

I'm going to continue to work on this problem throughout the day. I need to think more about what is actually happening instead of just plugging and chugging imo anyway.
 
Alright I think I got it by really slowing down to think about it. There's still one part I haven't reconciled with intuition. Namely ##t' = \frac{l_0}{v}## when ##B'## crosses ##A## because it almost looks classical; ##v## is the speed of ##B'## in ##S## and ##l_0## is proper length. Don't quite get it. I'll think about it some more.Now for the solution handled as generally as possible.

Start with equations.


(x′t′)=(γ−γv−γvc2γ)(xt)(x′t′)=(γ−γv−γvc2γ)(xt)

(xt)=(γγvγvc2γ)(x′t′)(xt)=(γγvγvc2γ)(x′t′)​
1) Observer at ##A'## is adamant that the position of ##B'## is ##-l_0## so we have ##S'_{B'} = \left( - l_0, t' \right)##

2) Observer at ##A## is adamant that the velocity of ##B'## is ##(+v)## but its position isn't ##-l_0##. Let's call the position of ##B'## in ##S##; ##l_s## so it has coordinates ##S_{B'} = \left( -l_s + vt, t \right)##.


(ls+vtt)=(γγvγvc2γ)(−l0t)(ls+vtt)=(γγvγvc2γ)(−l0t)​
##B'## crosses ##A## when ##-l_s + vt = 0 \Rightarrow t = \frac{l_s}{v}##


(0lsv)=(γγvγvc2γ)(−l0t)(0lsv)=(γγvγvc2γ)(−l0t)​
We need to solve for ##l_s##


−γl0+γvt′=0⇒t′=l0v−γl0+γvt′=0⇒t′=l0v​
The above part is kind of surprising for aforementioned reasons


lsv=−γvc2l0+γl0vlsv=−γvc2l0+γl0v

lsv=γl0(−vc2+1v)lsv=γl0(−vc2+1v)

ls=γl0(−vc2+1)ls=γl0(−vc2+1)​
$$l_s = \gamma l_0 \left( 1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2} \right) = \gamma \left( \frac{1}{\gamma^2 \right) l_0 = \frac{l_0}{\gamma}$$

As mentioned earlier ##t = \frac{ls}{v}## so we have


t2=l0γvt2=l0γv​
Well apparently my LaTeX got messed up.
 
0152E6DC-A218-4002-8730-12E5CA67588D.jpeg

28FC9606-4A06-4162-907A-7D8AB3C660F6.jpeg
 
  • #10
PhDeezNutz said:
There's still one part I haven't reconciled with intuition. Namely ##t' = \frac{l_0}{v}## when ##B'## crosses ##A## because it almost looks classical; ##v## is the speed of ##B'## in ##S## and ##l_0## is proper length. Don't quite get it.
From S' viewpoint, the point A (in S) moves to the left with speed v and the distance A must travel to get from the front to the back of the ship is the length of the ship in S'.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
889
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K