Quick Introduction to Tensor Analysis

Click For Summary
Ruslan Sharipov's online textbook on tensor analysis is highlighted for its interactive, do-it-yourself approach, making it accessible for learners. A user expresses improved understanding of tensors, vectors, and covectors after engaging with the material but struggles with the transformation rules for linear operators between different bases. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between natural and non-natural bases in tensor analysis, particularly regarding vector components. An example involving vector displacement in N-dimensional Euclidean space illustrates the application of the chain rule and the concept of basis vectors. Overall, the thread underscores the importance of grasping foundational concepts in tensor calculus for deeper comprehension.
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
6,843
Reaction score
11
Ruslan Sharipov has a nifty online textbook on this subject. It's written in interactive do-it-yourself style. Give it a glance, and see what you think.
 
  • Like
Likes Brownian_motion
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, Selfadjoint, I guess that now I comprehend better what tensors are. I printed the document out.
I comprhend what vectors and covectors are, and comprhend the rules of transformations between different bases. ALso, more or less have an idea about what linear operators and bilinear forms are. I have problems comprhending the rules of transformations of linear operators between different bases, I refer explicitly to page 20, that says that a linear operator F_{j}^{i} transforms to another basis as

<br /> \bar{F}_{j}^{i} = \sum_{p=1}^{3} \sum_{q=1}^{3} <br /> {T_{p}^{i} S_{j}^{q} F_{q}^{p}}<br />]


So, how do you get to the Ti p,Sq j and Fp q in the right side of the equality? I feel that I'm on the brim to completely understand tensor calculus, only have to work in a little details
 
When learning tensor analysis/differential geometry it should be noted that there are two quite different things which are called "components" of a vector. The difference has to do with the difference between a natural (aka coordinate) basis and a non-natural basis. Unfortunately I haven't created a web page for this yet but its not that difficult to describe.

Consider the vector displacement dr in an N-dimensional Euclidean space. Using the chain rule this can be expanded to read

d\mathbf {r} = \frac {\partial \mathbf {r}} {\partial x^{i}} dx^{i} = dx^{i} \mathbf {e}_{i}

where

\mathbf {e}_{i} = \frac {\partial \mathbf {r}}{\partial x^{i}}

These form a set of vectors in which all other vectors may be expanded (i.e. a basis). These basis vectors are called natural basis vectors aka coordinate basis vectors. These basis vectors are not always unit vectors.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
726
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
816
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K