Quick laplace transform question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Laplace transform, specifically the transformation of functions involving exponential terms and polynomial factors. Participants are examining the relationship between the Laplace transform of certain expressions and their corresponding time-domain functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand why the Laplace transform of 2/((s+4)^2) results in a term involving x and e^(-4x). There are questions about the implications of constants in the numerator and how they affect the transform.

Discussion Status

Some participants are evaluating the Laplace transform of the given expressions and reporting their findings. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the transformation process, with some guidance being offered on evaluating the transforms and considering the integration steps. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation of the transforms discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of Laplace transform formulas, particularly when constants are involved. Some participants express uncertainty about treating the expressions as separate transforms and the implications of the squared term in the denominator.

orangeincup
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I know 1/(s-a)=e^(a1), but why is say, 2/((s+4)^2) equal to 2xe^-4x? Do I just simply add an X if the numeration is a constant other than 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you evaluate the Laplace transform of the expression and see what you get?
 
2*e^(-4*x) is what I get, I don't know where the other x came from.

Well I mean I know it's because it's squared, I just don't see how my laplace transform formula is giving me that
 
orangeincup said:
2*e^(-4*x) is what I get, I don't know where the other x came from.

Well I mean I know it's because it's squared, I just don't see how my laplace transform formula is giving me that
Like I said, evaluate the LT of the expression with the x's and report back with what you got.
 
L(2x*e^(-4x)) = 2x* 1/(s-4)
 
Am I suppose to treat it as two different Laplace transforms combined? Not sure how that would work but I know the two individual formulas below
2/((s+4)^2)

1/s^n = t^n-1/(n-1)! = x*2
and
1/(s-a) = e^-4x
 
orangeincup said:
L(2x*e^(-4x)) = 2x* 1/(s-4)
Let's see you do the integration. How come you didn't include the leading x in the integration?

Chet
 
By the way, your original statements, that "1/(s-a)=e^(at)" and that "2/((s+4)^2) is equal to 2xe^-4x" are non-sense. You knew that when you wrote them, didn't you? What you meant was that "1/(s- a)" is the Laplace Transform" of "e^(at)" and that "2/((s+ 4)^2)" is the Laplace Transform of "2xe^(-x)". It is always better to say what you mean!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K