This is something that has been bothering me for awhile. Suppose we have some function f(x) = u(x) + iv(x), where u,v are real-valued functions. Obviously Re(f) = u(x) and Im(f) = v(x), both of which are real. My question is: in general, is it safe to say that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} Re(f) = Re\left(\frac{df}{dx}\right)[/tex]

? If so, that makes life a lot easier with trig identities dealing with derivatives. This seems really trivial, and I feel like it's correct, but I can't figure out how one would prove it, and I don't want to use it just assuming that it is true...

Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Quick question about the derivative of a complex-valued function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Quick question derivative | Date |
---|---|

Eigenvalue and vector quick question | Aug 14, 2015 |

Quick calc 1 question | Jul 16, 2014 |

Quick question on double/triple integrals for area and volume | Apr 19, 2014 |

Quick Integral/Derivative question. | Dec 1, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**