Derivatives of Lagrangian Terms: Why We Lower?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differentiation of Lagrangian terms, specifically the derivatives of fields represented as ##\partial_{\nu}\phi## and ##\partial^{\nu}\phi##. Participants clarify that these terms are components of vector fields rather than elements of distinct vector spaces, emphasizing the role of the metric in relating them. The consensus is that while one could treat the Lagrangian as a function of both forms, it is simpler to lower or raise indices for consistency in calculations. The importance of proper variation in the context of the Euler-Lagrange equations is also highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and operations
  • Knowledge of metric tensors and their role in physics
  • Basic grasp of the Euler-Lagrange equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of metric tensors in Lagrangian formulations
  • Learn about the chain rule in the context of variational calculus
  • Explore the relationship between vector spaces and dual spaces in physics
  • Investigate the derivation of Euler-Lagrange equations from different forms of the Lagrangian
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in theoretical physics, mathematical physics, and anyone working with Lagrangian mechanics and field theory.

TroyElliott
Messages
58
Reaction score
3
In Lagrangians we often take derivatives (##\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi)}##) of terms like ##(\partial_{\nu}\phi \partial^{\nu}\phi)##. We lower the ##\partial^{\nu}## term with the metric and do the usual product rule. My question is why do we do this? Isn't ##\partial^{\nu}\phi## an element of a different vector space? I would think that ##\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi)}## is really just shorthand for a tensor product of operators, with one being an identity operator in the ##\partial^{\nu}## space. Can anyone explain why this isn't the correct way of looking at doing such a derivative? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your Lagrangian also contains implicitly a metric, which is a mapping between vector spaces and dual spaces. Write it out in full and use the chain rule :)

I don't get your "I would think"-remark, though.
 
Mmm, perhaps I didn't get your question.
 
It is not a question of what vector spaces things belong to. It is a question about what things you can vary independently. Due to ##\partial^\mu\phi## being directly related to ##\partial_\mu\phi## through the metric, they do not vary independently (and neither does ##\phi##, that is why you have a term ##\partial/\partial\phi##.

Now, you could consider the Lagrangian as a function of ##\partial^\mu\phi## and ##\partial_\mu\phi## and obtain an extra derivative in your EL equations. The end result would be the same anyway so it is typically simpler to lower (or raise) all indices and work from there.
 
haushofer said:
Well, your Lagrangian also contains implicitly a metric, which is a mapping between vector spaces and dual spaces. Write it out in full and use the chain rule :)

I don't get your "I would think"-remark, though.

I was trying to say that if ##\partial_{\nu}\phi## is in some vector space and ##\partial^{\nu}\phi## is located in a different vector space, both connected through a linear map ##g^{\mu \nu}##, I would think that we would have to explicitly choose the vector space that our operator ##\partial_{\nu}## is acting on i.e. either the original vector space or the dual space.
 
##\partial_{\nu} \phi## and ##\partial^{\nu} \phi## are not in a vector space, they are components of vectors (or more precisely vector fields).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TroyElliott
Also, the partial derivatives do not act on vector fields. You generally need a connection for that.

Regardless, I think the issue has been properly addressed by the first few posts.

TroyElliott said:
I was trying to say that if ##\partial_{\nu}\phi## is in some vector space and ##\partial^{\nu}\phi## is located in a different vector space, both connected through a linear map ##g^{\mu \nu}##, I would think that we would have to explicitly choose the vector space that our operator ##\partial_{\nu}## is acting on i.e. either the original vector space or the dual space.
See #4. It does not matter if you pick one or use both as long as you do your variation properly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TroyElliott

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
456
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
935
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K