Quick Question of convergence/divergence of an endpoint of an interval

  • Thread starter Thread starter anniecvc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the series Ʃ (x^n)/(3n n^2) with an interval of convergence identified as -3 > x > 3. The user confirms convergence at x = 3 using the p-series test for 1/n^2. However, there is uncertainty regarding the negative endpoint x = -3, where the series transforms into Ʃ (-3)^n/(3n n^2). The user argues that the series diverges due to the growth rates of the numerator and denominator, despite the alternating series test suggesting convergence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence tests, particularly the alternating series test.
  • Familiarity with p-series and their convergence criteria.
  • Knowledge of limits and growth rates of functions, specifically exponential versus polynomial growth.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of series and summations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Alternating Series Test and its conditions for convergence.
  • Study the properties of p-series, focusing on convergence for p > 1.
  • Explore the comparison test for series convergence, particularly with alternating series.
  • Investigate the behavior of series as n approaches infinity, emphasizing limits and growth rates.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on series convergence, mathematicians analyzing series behavior, and educators teaching convergence tests in advanced mathematics courses.

anniecvc
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have found the interval of convergence for the series
Ʃ (xn)/(3nn2) to be -3>x>3 and have tested +3 to break down to p series 1/n2 which converges.

However I am unsure of the negative endpoint of 3.
If I plug it in, the series looks like Ʃ(-3)n/(3nn2).
By alternating series test, the series should converge, but that is when the alternation is between -1 and 1. Here I have -3, which will alternate between larger and larger factors of 3 and -3. The denominator is 3n which given alone with the numerator would diverge, even though the denominator is multiplied by n2, I feel it is not sufficiently large enough for the limit to go to 0 as n -> ∞, since an exponential function grows more quickly than a quadratic.

I want to say it diverges, but don't have solid proof. Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anniecvc said:

Homework Statement


I have found the interval of convergence for the series
Ʃ (xn)/(3nn2) to be -3>x>3 and have tested +3 to break down to p series 1/n2 which converges.

However I am unsure of the negative endpoint of 3.
If I plug it in, the series looks like Ʃ(-3)n/(3nn2).
By alternating series test, the series should converge, but that is when the alternation is between -1 and 1. Here I have -3, which will alternate between larger and larger factors of 3 and -3. The denominator is 3n which given alone with the numerator would diverge, even though the denominator is multiplied by n2, I feel it is not sufficiently large enough for the limit to go to 0 as n -> ∞, since an exponential function grows more quickly than a quadratic.

I want to say it diverges, but don't have solid proof. Thoughts?

That simplifies to$$
\sum \frac {(-1)^n}{n^2}$$doesn't it? What does the alternating series test say about this?
 
(-3)^n/3^n=(-1)^n. I'm really not sure what you are worried about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K