Quick Trigonometric Identity Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the transformation of the trigonometric identity ##\sin\frac{(x+y)}{2} \cdot \cos\frac{(x-y)}{2}## into the form ##\frac{1}{2}(\sin x + \sin y)##. The user seeks confirmation on the validity of this transformation while working on a double integral defined over the region bounded by the equations ##x+y=0##, ##x-y=0##, and ##y=0##. The transformation is confirmed as valid, although the user later realizes that applying the identity does not simplify the integral due to the upper bound being ##2-x## for ##y##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, specifically ##\sin x + \sin y##.
  • Familiarity with double integrals and regions of integration.
  • Knowledge of variable substitution in integrals.
  • Basic calculus concepts related to integration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the trigonometric identity ##\sin x + \sin y = 2 \sin \frac{(x+y)}{2} \cdot \cos \frac{(x-y)}{2}##.
  • Learn about defining and analyzing regions of integration in double integrals.
  • Explore variable substitution techniques in calculus to simplify integrals.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in applying trigonometric identities in integration problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focused on calculus and trigonometry, as well as anyone working on integral transformations and variable substitutions.

Draconifors
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi! I have an integral to solve (that's not the point, though) and the inside of the integral is almost a trig identity:

1. Homework Statement

##sin\frac{(x+y)} {2}*cos\frac{(x-y)} {2} ##

Homework Equations



I noticed this was very similar to ##sinx+siny = 2sin \frac{(x+y)} {2} * cos\frac{(x-y)} {2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Initially, within the context of the problem (a double integral over a certain region) I had used a change of variables which, while tedious, was doable (I can share that work, if you want). While reviewing my work, I recalled this identity, and just wanted to make sure whether or not I could transform the equation into ## \frac {1} {2} (sinx+siny) = sin \frac{(x+y)} {2} * cos\frac{(x-y)} {2}##. I don't see why I couldn't, but I just want a confirmation.

Thank you for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draconifors said:
Hi! I have an integral to solve (that's not the point, though) and the inside of the integral is almost a trig identity:

1. Homework Statement

##sin\frac{(x+y)} {2}*cos\frac{(x-y)} {2} ##

Homework Equations



I noticed this was very similar to ##sinx+siny = 2sin \frac{(x+y)} {2} * cos\frac{(x-y)} {2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Initially, within the context of the problem (a double integral over a certain region) I had used a change of variables which, while tedious, was doable (I can share that work, if you want). While reviewing my work, I recalled this identity, and just wanted to make sure whether or not I could transform the equation into ## \frac {1} {2} (sinx+siny) = sin \frac{(x+y)} {2} * cos\frac{(x-y)} {2}##. I don't see why I couldn't, but I just want a confirmation.

Thank you for your time!
That looks perfectly fine to me.

What is region of integration?
 
SammyS said:
That looks perfectly fine to me.

What is region of integration?

Thank you for your answer!

The region is bounded by ##x+y=0 ##, ##x+y=2 ## and ##y=0 ##.

That's why I had initially defined ##u=x-y ## and ##v=x+y ##. It was a doable but kind of long integral to do, so I wanted to see whether I could shorten it down.
 
Draconifors said:
Thank you for your answer!

The region is bounded by ##x+y=0 ##, ##x+y=2 ## and ##y=0 ##.

That's why I had initially defined ##u=x-y ## and ##v=x+y ##. It was a doable but kind of long integral to do, so I wanted to see whether I could shorten it down.
That region is not bounded. Is there a typo ?
 
SammyS said:
That region is not bounded. Is there a typo ?

Yes, I'm sorry!

It should read ##x-y=0## for the first equation.And I'm redoing my problem using the trigonometric identity, and I notice that it's not actually shorter because of my upper bound being 2-x for y.
 
Draconifors said:
Yes, I'm sorry!

It should read ##x-y=0## for the first equation.And I'm redoing my problem using the trigonometric identity, and I notice that it's not actually shorter because of my upper bound being 2-x for y.
Well, it was a good idea anyway. It just didn't work out in this case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K