Rad/s vs rev/min- label question

  • #1
According to the equations for angular, linear velocity and acceleration, it is in rad/s. So, for my own mindset, I always change everything to rad/s. (As opposed to rev/min or something) And now it's a habit, like reducing fractions. I didn't understand what we were doing very well for some reason, so that may be part of it. We don't do much work in my physics class, so it's easy to get lost. :P
Is this bad to do? Or at least annoying in the real science world? Because if it is unnecessary or annoying, then I shall stop. What do physicists/engineers/whatever use? My teacher said he wasn't sure, but the answer book took both answers.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,027
85
Using everything in common units is fine in almost all walks of life, especially textbook cases.

In engineering you get all sorts of very odd numbering conventions. You will find one company always uses RPM and others use rad/s. I've even seen Rev/s, and CPS used.
 
  • #3
249
0
What do physicists/engineers/whatever use?

Almost without exception, physicists use radians/second. You probably can't go wrong in physics using this convention.
 

Related Threads on Rad/s vs rev/min- label question

  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
781
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
32K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
23K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top