How do I calculate radial stress in a u-shaped t-beam with varying thickness?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating radial stress (\(\sigma_{r}\)) in a u-shaped t-beam with varying thickness, specifically at \(\theta=0\) degrees. The formula provided is \(\sigma_{r}=\frac{1}{tr}\int t\sigma_{\theta}dr\), where the integration limits are defined by the inner radius \(a\) and a variable radius \(r\). The user struggles with incorporating the varying thickness into the integration process and seeks clarification on defining the limits for the integral. The proposed methods involving subscripts for different cross-section portions do not yield satisfactory results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radial stress calculations in structural engineering
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of beam theory and cross-sectional analysis
  • Experience with variable thickness in mechanical components
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Integration techniques for varying thickness in beams"
  • Study "Radial stress calculations in cylindrical structures"
  • Learn about "Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for complex geometries"
  • Explore "Beam theory applications in mechanical engineering"
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and students involved in beam analysis and stress calculations will benefit from this discussion.

Jonny Black
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a u-shaped t-beam, and I am trying to calculate the radial stress where \theta=0 degrees. I have calculated \sigma\theta_{} but I am unclear on how to treat the varying thickness of the cross-section when integrating with respect to radius.
 

Attachments

  • scan0035.jpg
    scan0035.jpg
    38.1 KB · Views: 1,238
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hey Johnny,

You have to show your work first, so we can pinpoint where you went wrong.
 
\sigma_{r}=\frac{1}{tr}\int t\sigma_{\theta}dr
with a lower limit of a=inner radius, and upper limit of r=variable radius. For one, why is the thickness even included in the equation since it cancels anyway, and two, how do I treat the varying thickness of the cross-section? I have tried
\sigma_{r}=\frac{1}{t_{1}r}\int^{b}_{a} t_{1}\sigma_{\theta}dr+\frac{1}{t_{2}r}\int^{c}_{b} t_{2}\sigma_{\theta}dr

\sigma_{r}=\frac{1}{t_{1}r}\int^{r}_{a} t_{1}\sigma_{\theta}dr+\frac{1}{t_{2}r}\int^{r}_{b} t_{2}\sigma_{\theta}dr
where the subscripts 1 & 2 denote the horizontal and vertical portions of the cross-section, respectively. Neither method gives viable results. a, b, and c denote radius's at each definition of the cross-section starting with the inner radius. I have found \sigma_{\theta} already, I just need to know how to define the limits of the integral
 
I have added a couple of files for clarification. Also, I am plotting the radial stress as a function of the radius so the end result will include the variable "r".
 

Attachments

  • scan0036.jpg
    scan0036.jpg
    33.7 KB · Views: 866
  • scan0037.jpg
    scan0037.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 764
...Anybody...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K