Radio communication from the galaxy's far side?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of radio communication traveling from the far side of the Milky Way galaxy to Earth. Participants explore the implications for a fictional narrative and consider the physical limitations and technological aspects of such communication.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that radio waves can indeed travel from the far side of the galaxy to Earth, noting that while the distance is approximately 50,000 light years, radio waves are less affected by galactic dust compared to shorter wavelengths.
  • Others highlight the significant time delay involved, estimating that messages would take around 50,000 years to reach Earth and an equal time to return.
  • A participant mentions the hydrogen line as a potential candidate for interstellar communication, reiterating the long time frames required for any communication.
  • There is a discussion about the limitations of viewing the obscured parts of the galaxy, with some clarifying that while direct visual observation is impossible, instruments operating in different frequencies, such as infrared telescopes, can penetrate the dust.
  • Some participants reflect on the implications of such long communication times in the context of human technological evolution and the rapid advancements in observational technology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that radio communication from the far side of the galaxy is theoretically possible, but there is no consensus on the implications of the long time delays or the feasibility of viewing the obscured regions of the galaxy.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding about the scientific concepts involved, and some acknowledge limitations in their knowledge. The discussion includes assumptions about technology levels and the nature of communication.

modus
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Is it at all possible for radio communication to travel from the obscured part of our galaxy to Earth? If so, about how long would it take to reach us?

I have an idea for fiction where we're able to receive communications from the far side of the Milky Way, but we can't figure out how to communicate back, and the pursuit of trying to communicate back divides people and so forth. However if it's completely impossible in the realm of physics to receive communications from the far side of the galaxy, I'll have to rethink the idea.

Note: I have little to no scientific background. Sorry, I'm working on it, though I have math-related disabilities.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If so, about how long would it take to reach us?
We are ~25000 light years away from the galactic center, if the sender has the same distance (but in the opposite direction) it takes ~50000 years per direction.

Is it at all possible for radio communication to travel from the obscured part of our galaxy to Earth?
I don't know about the absorption, but if you want 1-way communication, you can use a different technology level: Assume that the sender emits a real powerful signal, and we cannot reach a comparable intensity yet.
 
The hydrogen line is regarded as being a good candidate for interstellar communication but as has been pointed out any message is going to take tens of thousands of years to get there and an equal time to get back.
 
modus said:
Is it at all possible for radio communication to travel from the obscured part of our galaxy to Earth? If so, about how long would it take to reach us?

I have an idea for fiction where we're able to receive communications from the far side of the Milky Way, but we can't figure out how to communicate back, and the pursuit of trying to communicate back divides people and so forth. However if it's completely impossible in the realm of physics to receive communications from the far side of the galaxy, I'll have to rethink the idea.

Note: I have little to no scientific background. Sorry, I'm working on it, though I have math-related disabilities.

The dust in the galactic plane scatters radiation, but the amount of scattering is proportional to the fourth power of the frequency. This means short wavelengths like light are heavily absorbed, but longer wavelengths like radio propagate through the dust without being significantly absorbed or scattered. So yes, radio waves can travel to Earth from the far side of the galaxy. As others have said, it will take 25,000-50,000 years, depending on where it is coming from.
 
mfb said:
We are ~25000 light years away from the galactic center, if the sender has the same distance (but in the opposite direction) it takes ~50000 years per direction.

Thanks for the answers so far, very heartening to know this is in the realm of possibility. 50,000 years in the grand scheme of things isn't too terribly long.

Ryan_m_b said:
The hydrogen line is regarded as being a good candidate for interstellar communication but as has been pointed out any message is going to take tens of thousands of years to get there and an equal time to get back.

This is a little above me but thanks, I understand the underlying concept. I was also lead to an article about the Pioneer Plaque which sort of blew my mind a second time. I never asked how we could communicate to outside intelligent life about where we're located, but that exact question occurred to me earlier today. Question answered.

phyzguy said:
The dust in the galactic plane scatters radiation, but the amount of scattering is proportional to the fourth power of the frequency. This means short wavelengths like light are heavily absorbed, but longer wavelengths like radio propagate through the dust without being significantly absorbed or scattered. So yes, radio waves can travel to Earth from the far side of the galaxy. As others have said, it will take 25,000-50,000 years, depending on where it is coming from.

That's great. I thought that was impossible. But to my understanding viewing the obscured part of our galaxy is impossible, right?
 
modus said:
50,000 years in the grand scheme of things isn't too terribly long.
In terms of evolution of the universe and life, it is short. In terms of human technology, it is extremely long.
50000 years ago, our ancestors used stone tools and invented gods for thunder and lightning, as they had no idea how to explain it otherwise.
We can receive radio signals for less than 100 years now, and laser signals for less than 50 years (if we look at the right frequency and in the right direction).
Every 10 to 20 years, new telescopes are so much more powerful that the older ones are not competitive any more. At the same time, computing power increases by a factor of ~30-1000.
 
modus said:
That's great. I thought that was impossible. But to my understanding viewing the obscured part of our galaxy is impossible, right?

If by viewing, you mean looking with your eyes, then yes. If by viewing, you mean using instruments in other frequencies, then not necessarily.
 
phinds said:
If by viewing, you mean looking with your eyes, then yes. If by viewing, you mean using instruments in other frequencies, then not necessarily.

Right. For example, infrared telescopes are capable of seeing through the dust and imaging the starts at the galactic center. This could count as "viewing".
 
mfb said:
In terms of evolution of the universe and life, it is short. In terms of human technology, it is extremely long.
50000 years ago, our ancestors used stone tools and invented gods for thunder and lightning, as they had no idea how to explain it otherwise.
Just to add to this our species is only 200ky old.
 
  • #10
phyzguy said:
Right. For example, infrared telescopes are capable of seeing through the dust and imaging the starts at the galactic center. This could count as "viewing".

I think astronomers would take issue with "could".
 
  • #11
phinds said:
I think astronomers would take issue with "could".

I'd say so. I know I count it as "viewing".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K