How to Calculate Radioactivity Activity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the activity of a gamma radiation source, specifically using the concept of becquerels (Bq). The user initially miscalculated the activity by converting measurements to meters instead of keeping them in millimeters. The correct approach involves determining the fraction of emitted gamma photons captured by the detector, which is based on the ratio of the detector's area to the total surface area of the sphere at the given distance. The final calculated activity of the source is confirmed to be 1.57x105 Bq.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and activity measurement (Becquerel, Bq)
  • Knowledge of spherical geometry and surface area calculations
  • Familiarity with gamma radiation properties and detection methods
  • Basic mathematical skills for unit conversion and ratio calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of radioactive decay and the significance of the becquerel (Bq) unit
  • Learn about the geometry of radiation detection, focusing on spherical surface area calculations
  • Explore different types of radiation detectors and their efficiencies
  • Investigate methods for calculating activity from detected counts in various experimental setups
USEFUL FOR

Students in nuclear physics, radiation safety professionals, and anyone involved in radiation measurement and detection methodologies.

Magma828
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Okay this question is in a section of my textbook that has no equations, apart from the slightly mathematical statement:

The rate at which a source emits radioactive particles is called its activity, A. An activity of one particle emitted per second is called a becquerel, Bq.

Here's the question..

A small source of gamma radiation is placed at a distance of 160 mm from a detector of area 18 mm^2. The count recorded on the detector after 30 minutes was 15804.

Estimate the activity of the source.


I worked out the counts detected per second (15804/30/60 = 8.78) but I don't know how to deal with the distance between the source and detector, or the area of the detector.

The final answer is supposed to be 1.57x10^5 Bq----

Okay I've got somewhere[ish] with the solution, but didn't get the correct answer:
The gamma source emits radioactivity in all directions, but is only detected by the 18mm^2 detector.

Calculating the total surface area of the sphere in which the detector could potentially be in is: 4 pi r^2 = 4 x 3.14 x 0.16^2 = 0.32m^2

If this surface area was full of detectors, the counts recorded would be 100% of the counts. The number of potential detectors you could fit into this space would be: total surface area / surface area of detector = 0.32/0.018 = 17.87 detectors.

Therefore, if 15804 counts are detected by one detector, the number of counts detected by 17.87 detectors would be 15804 x 17.87 = 282x10^3 counts in 30 minutes.

I'm sure my solution makes sense, but it's wrong!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


The radiation source emits gamma radiation uniformly (or almost uniformly) in all directions. The detector only managed to "capture" a certain percentage of the emitted gamma photons. So, to obtain the activity of the source, we have to calculate backwards using the fraction of photons emitted that were captured by the detector.

Now, since the radiation source emits gamma radiation uniformly in all directions, the gamma photons are spread out over a spherical surface. It thus follows that the fraction of photons captured by the detector is given by the surface area of the detector divided by the surface area of that spherical surface (the fraction of the spherical surface that is covered by the detector)
 


Does that mean that my solution is correct then? I think I've done what you said there:

Calculating the total surface area of the sphere in which the detector could potentially be in is: 4 pi r^2 = 4 x 3.14 x 0.16^2 = 0.32m^2

If this surface area was full of detectors, the counts recorded would be 100% of the counts. The number of potential detectors you could fit into this space would be: total surface area / surface area of detector = 0.32/0.018 = 17.87 detectors.

Therefore, if 15804 counts are detected by one detector, the number of counts detected by 17.87 detectors would be 15804 x 17.87 = 282x10^3 counts in 30 minutes.

Maybe I made a stupid mistake somewhere..

OOOOH nevermind, my methodology was right but I should have just used the distances and areas in mm (as it's just ratios) instead of incorrectly converting them to metres.

So yeah I've done it, thanks :D
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K