Radioactivity Question, Is this method correct?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the amount of a radioactive substance at time t1 + λ will be half of the amount at time t1, given the expression for decay. The key equation used is y = y0 e^(kt), with λ defined as -ln(2)/k, representing the half-life. The initial approach contained a mistake in calculating t1, which was later corrected. The final solution confirms that at t1 + λ, the amount indeed equals y1/2, validating the method. The participants conclude that the correct application of the exponential decay formula leads to the desired result.
Irishdoug
Messages
102
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


Show using your expression for \lambda that if at a time t1 the amount is y1, then at a time t1 + ##\lambda## the amount will be ##\frac{y1}{2}##, no matter what t1 is.

Homework Equations


y = y0 ##e^{kt}##

From previous question: half life ##\lambda =-ln2/k##

The Attempt at a Solution


y1 = y0 ##e^{kt1}## so t1 = ##\frac{lny1}{y0k}##

so:

y (t1+## \lambda ##) = y0 e^(k ##\frac{lny1}{y0k}##+ k## \frac{-ln2}{k}##) = y0 e^{ln##\frac{y1}{y0}## +2}

The k's cancel.
-ln2 = ln 1/2
The e and ln cancels

so;
yo * ##\frac{y1}{y0}## * ##\frac{1}{2}## = ##\frac{y1}{2}##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fixed the formatting!
 
Irishdoug said:
y (t1+λλ \lambda ) = y0 e^(k lny1y0klny1y0k\frac{lny1}{y0k}+ k−ln2k−ln2k \frac{-ln2}{k}) = y0 e^{lny1y0y1y0\frac{y1}{y0} +2}

This is not correct.
 
I figured it out! Cheers for the response!
 
Irishdoug said:

Homework Statement


Show using your expression for ## \lambda## that if at a time ## t_1## the amount is ##y_1##, then at a time ##t_1 + \lambda## the amount will be ## \frac{y1}{2}##, no matter what ##t_1## is.

Homework Equations


$$ y_t = y_0 e{(kt)}$$

From previous question: half life ##\lambda =\dfrac{-ln2}{k}##

The Attempt at a Solution


$$y_1 = y_0 e^{(kt_1)} \ \ $$
I think the last statement in the first line of 3 is wrong, ie. not ## t_1 = \dfrac {ln( y_1)}{y_0 k} ##
 
Merlin3189 said:
I think the last statement in the first line of 3 is wrong, ie. not ## t_1 = \dfrac {ln( y_1)}{y_0 k} ##

Hi. What I did instead was:

y0 ##e^{kt1+ \lambda}## --> ##\lambda =-ln2/k##

= y0##e^{kt1}## * ##e^{k \lambda}## =

y1 * ##e^{ln(1/2)}##

= ##\frac{y1}{2}##
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K