Radiological Health Engineering Student

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a second-year student's considerations for their academic path in Radiological Health Engineering at Texas A&M University. The student is exploring various options for their degree, including potential double degrees, minors, and certificates, while expressing uncertainty about their future career in the nuclear field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • The student has several options for their academic path, including a double degree in Radiological Health and Nuclear Engineering, a double degree in Radiological Health and Math, or pursuing a master's in Health Physics.
  • Some participants suggest that the student should consider options #2 (double degree in Radiological Health and Nuclear Engineering) or #5 (fast track master's in Health Physics) based on their interests.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of not limiting coursework too much, suggesting that the student might regret not taking more classes later on.
  • The student expresses a desire to meet with professors for further guidance on their choices.
  • Another participant notes that if the student finds health physics and medical physics boring, pursuing a master's in those areas may not be advisable, suggesting a switch to nuclear engineering instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the student has multiple viable options, but there is no consensus on which path is the best. Some advocate for specific options while others emphasize the importance of personal interest and experience.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying levels of interest in different fields within nuclear engineering and health physics, with some participants highlighting the overlap between these disciplines. The student's preferences and experiences are acknowledged but not fully explored.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students in similar fields contemplating their academic and career paths, particularly those interested in the intersections of health physics, engineering, and nuclear science.

Jamal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, I am a 2nd year student at Texas A&M University studying Radiological Health Engineering which is a good mix between Health Physics and Engineering. This fall I will be entering my second year and have some decisions to make. I gained a good amount of hours in high school that transferred to college, so I have some room in my schedule to do a couple different things. I have roughly 20 "free" hours that I can do something with. The only caveat is that I currently do not know what I want to do as a career (in the nuclear field). I was looking into Health Physics or Medical Physics, but I recently shadowed a Radiation Safety Officer and a Medical Physicist that was checking the calibration of various xray machines and found both to be boring. I would rather have a job more on the engineering side of things. I'm here for some advice to see what would be the best route for me to follow. They are in no particular order.

1. Take just 12 hours a semester and graduate in 4 years with a Bachelors.
2. Double degree in Radiological Health and Nuclear Engineering (16 hours avg).
3. Double degree in Rad Health and Math (15 hours avg).
4. Minor in 2 of the 3 following Statistics, Biology, or Physics (17 hours avg).
5. Fast track master's in Health Physics adding 1 semester to my degree plan.
6. Engineering Safety Certificate and/or Therapeutic Certificate.
7. None of the above, and graduate a semester early (15 hours avg).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would advise #2 or #5. And work hard to get an internship with one of the electric utilities at an operating nuclear plant.
 
I think it's good that you took the initiative to do a job shadow and are making decisions based on your own experiences. I don't think you have any real bad options there. The only advice I would offer is that if you try to go through with a minimum of course work then you might be disappointed you didn't do more later on.
 
Thank you, yes I do have a preference on some of these choices did not want to say which ones to create a bias in the responses I receive. I assure you that doing the minimum is last of my choices. I plan on meeting with several of my professors at the beginning of the year and seeing what they think of my choices.
 
If you found health physics and medical physics to be boring career wise then my advice is to go for option 2. Doesn't make sense to get a masters in something you may not even enjoy career wise. It shouldn't be too hard to switch to nuclear engineering if you like the engineering side more, there's a good bit of overlap between the two fields
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K