MHB Radius of Convergence for $\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^{2j}}{2^j}$

Click For Summary
The radius of convergence for the series $\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^{2j}}{2^j}$ is determined to be $\sqrt{2}$. By substituting $z^2 = x$, the series can be analyzed using the ratio test, yielding a radius of convergence of 2 for $x$. The transformation shows that the series behaves like a geometric series, converging for $|z| < \sqrt{2}$. The Cauchy root test further confirms this result, indicating that the series converges under the condition $|z| < \sqrt{2}$. Thus, the original series has a radius of convergence of $\sqrt{2}$.
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Radius of convergence of $\displaystyle \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{z^{2j}}{2^j}$.

If I let $z^2 = x$ I get a series whose radius of convergence is $2$ (by the ratio test).

How do I get from this that the original series has a radius of convergence equal to $\sqrt{2}$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\dfrac{z^{2j}}{2^j}=\left(\dfrac{z}{\sqrt2}\right)^{2j}$$, so the series is a geometric series which converges for all $$|z|<\sqrt2$$.
 
Thank you.

Cauchy root test gives: $\displaystyle (\lim |a_n|^{1/n})^{-1} =\left(\lim \left|\frac{x^{2n}}{2^n}\right|^{1/n}\right)^{-1} = \lim \left|\frac{x^2}{2}\right| = \frac{1}{2} |x|$ and $\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} |x^2| < 1 \implies |x| < \sqrt{2}. $ So $R = \sqrt{2}$

However, my book says $R = (\lim |a_n|^{1/n})^{-1})$ (if it exists). Surely, that can't be right as I still have $x$ term in the limit?
 
greg1313 said:
$$\dfrac{z^{2j}}{2^j}=\left(\dfrac{z}{\sqrt2}\right)^{2j}$$, so the series is a geometric series which converges for all $$|z|<\sqrt2$$.

Technically it would need to be written as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( \frac{z^2}{2} \right) ^j \end{align*}$ to be read off as a geometric series. So it converges where the absolute value of the common ratio $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| \frac{z^2}{2} \right| < 1 \implies \left| z^2 \right| < 2 \implies \left| z \right| < \sqrt{2} \end{align*}$...
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K