Radius of Curvature of a Train Turning North East

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter harini_5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Radius
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the radius of curvature of a train turning towards the northeast. It establishes that the outer rail's radius of curvature is greater than that of the inner rail due to the physical width of the train. The conversation emphasizes that while the velocity and radial acceleration remain constant, the radius of curvature must account for the train's dimensions rather than treating it as a point mass. This distinction is crucial for understanding the dynamics of trains on curved tracks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Centripetal acceleration concepts
  • Understanding of radius of curvature
  • Knowledge of train dynamics and geometry
  • Familiarity with non-point mass physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of centripetal acceleration in non-point masses
  • Explore the geometry of circular tracks and their impact on train dynamics
  • Investigate the effects of train width on curvature calculations
  • Learn about the physics of turning in large vehicles, specifically trains
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and transportation planners interested in the dynamics of train movement and curvature effects on rail systems.

harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A train is moving towards north at one place.
it turns towards north east.
here we observe that the radius of curvature of outer rail will be greater than that of inner rail
why?pls explain
velocity and radial acc. are the same and radius of curvature=v^2/a normal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are focusing too much on the equations here...

if you consider a train going about a circular track, the inner and outer rail of the track will both be circular, but the outer rail will have a radius greater than the inner rail by the width of the train.

this is all this statement is saying.

in the equation for centripetal accelleration the radius is assuming a point particle, which a train is not.

the same equation is true for a non-point-mass where the radius is then for the center of mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K