Radius of Ring Singularity in Kerr Black Hole

In summary, despite extensive research, there is currently no known method to calculate the radius of the ring singularity in a Kerr black hole. It is believed to be a function only of the black hole's mass and angular velocity. Some sources suggest using elliptical coordinates to establish the ring singularity within the inner horizon, while others propose a formula that relates the ring singularity's radius to the black hole's angular momentum and mass. However, there is no agreed upon formula or interpretation for the ring singularity's radius.
  • #1
edgepflow
688
1
I researched this some, but could not find a method to calculate the radius of the ring singularity in a Kerr black hole.

I would think it is a function only of black hole mass and angular velocity.

Please let me know if there is some reports or papers on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
edgepflow said:
I researched this some, but could not find a method to calculate the radius of the ring singularity in a Kerr black hole.

I would think it is a function only of black hole mass and angular velocity.

Please let me know if there is some reports or papers on this.

See the following, which gives the formula for the ring singulariy. Surprisingly, I could not find this anywhere in MTW (but it is possible I just missed it ...)

http://www.physics.mcmaster.ca/phys3a03/The Kerr Metric.ppt
 
  • #3
What does "radius" mean?

Consider the two-dimensional surface that results when [itex]t[/itex] is constant and [itex]r=0[/itex] in Kerr spacetime in standard Boyer-Lindquist coordinates. The metric for this two-dimensional surface can be found by setting [itex]dt=dr=r=0[/itex] in the Kerr metric. What is this metric?
 
  • #4
George Jones said:
What does "radius" mean?

Consider the two-dimensional surface that results when [itex]t[/itex] is constant and [itex]r=0[/itex] in Kerr spacetime in standard Boyer-Lindquist coordinates. The metric for this two-dimensional surface can be found by setting [itex]dt=dr=r=0[/itex] in the Kerr metric. What is this metric?

So is there something wrong with slide 15 in the power point I linked to above?
 
  • #5
PAllen said:
So is there something wrong with slide 15 in the power point I linked to above?

Oops, didn't see the link, just saw the reference to MTW. Now, that that you mention it, there is a mistake (simple typo) in the first equation of slide 15 :wink:.

This are a number of textbooks, including, I think, Carroll's that give this result. I'm not sure sure if there is an easy physics interpretation of this coordinate radius.
 
  • #6
George Jones said:
Oops, didn't see the link, just saw the reference to MTW. Now, that that you mention it, there is a mistake (simple typo) in the first equation of slide 15 :wink:.

This are a number of textbooks, including, I think, Carroll's that give this result. I'm not sure sure if there is an easy physics interpretation of this coordinate radius.

Should be a^2 not a ?
 
  • #7
PAllen said:
Should be a^2 not a ?

Yes.
 
  • #8
Thank you for the link PAllen and input from George Jones.

I will have to work on the slides in this link and deal with the abstraction.

I saw the formula: x^2 + y^2 = a^2 which is the equation of a circle of radius a. I am not sure what the range of x and y will be.

At the end of the day, I would like to develop a formula I can enter values of black hole mass and angular velocity, and figure the radius of the ring singularity. Similar idea to the nice, tidy equation for Schwarzschild radius for a non-rotating, uncharged black hole. But maybe this idea does not make physical sense for a Kerr black hole.
 
  • #9
edgepflow said:
At the end of the day, I would like to develop a formula I can enter values of black hole mass and angular velocity, and figure the radius of the ring singularity.

The parameter [itex]a[/itex] is given by [itex]a = J/M[/itex], where [itex]J[/itex] and [itex]M[/itex] are the angular momentum and mass of the black hole.
edgepflow said:
Similar idea to the nice, tidy equation for Schwarzschild radius for a non-rotating, uncharged black hole.

But this gives an expression for the event horizon, not the singularity.
 
  • #10
George Jones said:
But this gives an expression for the event horizon, not the singularity.
Thank you sir. Any theories about such a formula for the ring singularity?
 
  • #11
I'm not quite what you you're after.

Schwarzschild black hole: event horizon given by [itex]r = 2M[/itex]; singularity given by [itex]r=0[/itex] (with some subtleties). Kerr: event horizon given by [itex]r = M + \sqrt{M^2 + \left( J/M \right)^2 }[/itex]; singularity given by [itex]r = 0 \Leftrightarrow x^2 + y^2 = \left( J/M \right)^2[/itex]. Note the correspondence when the angular momentum [itex]J = 0[/itex].
 
  • #12
George Jones said:
I'm not quite what you you're after.

Schwarzschild black hole: event horizon given by [itex]r = 2M[/itex]; singularity given by [itex]r=0[/itex] (with some subtleties). Kerr: event horizon given by [itex]r = M + \sqrt{M^2 + \left( J/M \right)^2 }[/itex]; singularity given by [itex]r = 0 \Leftrightarrow x^2 + y^2 = \left( J/M \right)^2[/itex]. Note the correspondence when the angular momentum [itex]J = 0[/itex].
Thanks again. I can work with this.
 
  • #13
edgepflow said:
Thanks again. I can work with this.

In other words, the radius is just J/M. What could be simpler?
 
  • #14
PAllen said:
In other words, the radius is just J/M. What could be simpler?
Yes sir, I noticed that. :approve:
 
  • #15
You might also be interested in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_coordinate_system" [Broken] which establishes a as r=0 and the outer edge of the ring singularity as suggested in these links-

http://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/insidebh/waterfall.html (scroll down)

http://pisces.as.utexas.edu/GenRel/KerrMetric.pdf [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
stevebd1 said:
You might also be interested in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_coordinate_system" [Broken] which establishes a as r=0 and the outer edge of the ring singularity as suggested in these links-

http://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/insidebh/waterfall.html (scroll down)

http://pisces.as.utexas.edu/GenRel/KerrMetric.pdf [Broken]
Thanks. Equations 7.20 to 7.22 of your 2nd link help clarify Post #11.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
I noticed something interesting about this rotating black hole model.

Referring again to Equations 7.20 to 7.22 of stevebd1's 2nd link:

r+ = m + ([itex]m^{2}[/itex] + [itex]a^{2}[/itex])[itex]^{1/2}[/itex]

a = 0 => [itex]r_{+}[/itex] = 2m and [itex]r_{-}[/itex] = 0 (Schwarzschild recovery)
a = m => [itex]r_{+}[/itex] = [itex]r_{-}[/itex] = m (largest ring = 1/2 Schwarzschild radius)

And if I did my math right, try:

a = m / 2 => [itex]r_{+}[/itex] = 1.866 m and [itex]r_{-}[/itex] = 0.134 m

Which shows the inner horizon is smaller than the ring singularity. But the outer horizon still hides the singularity and thus avoids a naked singularity. The solution to the quadratic yields two horizons which seems to me to be essestial to avoid naked singularities. Remarkable.

Let me know if this is correct.
 
  • #18
This is one reason why I favour elliptical coordinates. The idea that the ring singularity resides between r+ and r- doesn't seem right as this is spacelike and technically no stable r is possible. Using the following simple equations establishes elliptical coordinates and always puts the ring singularity within r-.

[tex]x=\sqrt{r^2+a^2}\sin \theta[/tex]
[tex]y=r \cos \theta[/tex]

Attached are two images for a black hole with a spin parameter of a/M=0.95. The top image uses regular spherical coordinates while the bottom image uses elliptical coordinates and defines the ring singularity with a coordinate radius of [itex]a[/itex] while the singularity still resides at r=0 and [itex]\theta=\pi/2[/itex]. This also implies there is a new region of space (or extended Kerr geometry) at r<0.

I think I've seen one image where the ring singularity is between r+ and r- but I think the general census is that if it were to exist, it is within (or at maybe) r- unless there is some mathematical trick that allows it to hover at a specific radius within spacelike space which would be synonymous to something hovering at say 3.00pm in timelike space.
 

Attachments

  • Kerr_ellip.jpg
    Kerr_ellip.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 690

1. What is the radius of the ring singularity in a Kerr black hole?

The radius of the ring singularity in a Kerr black hole is equal to half of the black hole's event horizon radius. This is known as the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) and it varies depending on the black hole's spin parameter.

2. How is the radius of the ring singularity calculated?

The radius of the ring singularity is calculated using the Kerr metric equations, which describe the geometry of a rotating black hole. This calculation takes into account the black hole's mass, spin, and charge.

3. What happens at the radius of the ring singularity?

At the radius of the ring singularity, the gravitational pull is so strong that it causes space and time to become infinitely distorted. This is where the black hole's singularity, a point of infinite density and zero volume, is located.

4. Can the radius of the ring singularity change?

No, the radius of the ring singularity is a fixed value and does not change. However, the size of the event horizon and the spin of the black hole can affect the location of the ring singularity.

5. How does the radius of the ring singularity differ from the Schwarzschild radius?

The radius of the ring singularity is different from the Schwarzschild radius, which is the radius of the event horizon in a non-spinning black hole. The ring singularity is located inside the event horizon and is only present in a rotating (Kerr) black hole.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
688
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
289
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
992
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
709
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
760
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
870
Back
Top