Rain in a train wagon - speed, momentum and KE

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a train wagon that collects rainwater. The focus is on analyzing the effects of rain on the wagon's speed, momentum, and kinetic energy under three different scenarios: rain accumulating in the wagon, rain with water escaping through a hole, and rain stopping while water continues to escape.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of mass changes on speed, momentum, and kinetic energy in each scenario. Questions arise about why speed decreases in some cases but not in others, particularly in relation to the conservation of momentum and the effects of mass loss.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions, and clarifying reasoning. Some have provided mathematical expressions to support their thoughts, while others express uncertainty about the implications of the scenarios. There is a recognition of the complexity of the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for discussion. The original poster notes that they have been given the correct answers but are seeking explanations rather than solutions.

Bonulo
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
We have a physics exam tomorrow, and have been presented with a previous exam for practice. One of the assignments have puzzled us quite a bit. Here goes:

Rain in a train wagon
Consider a train wagon whose upper part is a lidless box. The train wagon moves without friction. There is water in the train wagon. In the following the system consisting of the train wagon and the water in it is considered. In 3 different situations (i, ii and iii) decide what happens with each of the three variables speed [itex]v[/itex], momentum [itex]p[/itex] and the kinetic energi [itex]K[/itex].

(i) It's raining vertically, and water is accumulated in the wagon.
(ii) As in (i) with the addition that there's now a hole in the bottom where the water's running out. The amount of water running out of the wagon is equal to the amount of water raining into the wagon.
(iii) The rain stops, but there is still a hole in the bottom of the wagon, where the water's running out.


Answers
Since we've been given the results (the correct answers, no explanations), I'm not interested in that information. Only the explanation.

(i) Result: Momentum is conserved, [itex]p[/itex] is not changed. I guess the system is a closed system. The speed [itex]v[/itex] decreases - because mass [itex]m[/itex] increases. Thus the kinetic energy [itex]K[/itex] drops too, since [itex]K[/itex] is proportional to the square of [itex]v[/itex].

(ii) Result: All three variables, [itex]p, v, K[/itex] drops. It's clear that since the mass is the same, a speed decrease causes the momentum and energy decrease. But why does the speed [itex]v[/itex] drop?

(iii) Result: Here, water is running out, and thus the mass [itex]m[/itex] decreases. This causes a decrease in [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]K[/itex], since the speed [itex]v[/itex] doesn't change. But why does the speed [itex]v[/itex] change in (i) and not in (iii) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bonulo said:
(i) Result: Momentum is conserved, [itex]p[/itex] is not changed. I guess the system is a closed system. The speed [itex]v[/itex] decreases - because mass [itex]m[/itex] increases. Thus the kinetic energy [itex]K[/itex] drops too, since [itex]K[/itex] is proportional to the square of [itex]v[/itex].

(ii) Result: All three variables, [itex]p, v, K[/itex] drops. It's clear that since the mass is the same, a speed decrease causes the momentum and energy decrease. But why does the speed [itex]v[/itex] drop?

(iii) Result: Here, water is running out, and thus the mass [itex]m[/itex] decreases. This causes a decrease in [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]K[/itex], since the speed [itex]v[/itex] doesn't change. But why does the speed [itex]v[/itex] change in (i) and not in (iii) ?

i) [tex]m_{car}v_i = m_{car+rain water}v_f[/tex]

Since [tex]m_{car} < m_{car+rain water}[/tex],

[tex]v_f < v_i[/tex]


ii) Let [itex]v_{i2} = v_f[/itex] from i) above.

[tex]m_{car+water}v_{i2} = m_{car+water-escaped water}v_{f2} + m_{escaped water}v_{f2}[/tex]

Since [tex]m_{car+water} = m_{car+water-escaped water} + m_{escaped water}[/tex]

[tex]v_{f2} = v_{i2}[/tex]


iii) Same as ii) but since the car is not slowing down due rain capture, it keeps going at the same rate.

AM
 
What I wrote to ii) was the result as stated in the solutions we got. There, the speed decreases, as does the momentum and kinetic energy.
 
Bonulo said:
What I wrote to ii) was the result as stated in the solutions we got. There, the speed decreases, as does the momentum and kinetic energy.
It should be no surprise that the speed (and thus momentum and kinetic energy) decreases in case ii): for every [itex]\Delta m[/itex] of zero speed rain that you add, you lose [itex]\Delta m[/itex] of [itex]v_i[/itex] speed rain. Thus, the momentum of car+water constantly decreases.

Andrew Mason said:
ii) Let [itex]v_{i2} = v_f[/itex] from i) above.

[tex]m_{car+water}v_{i2} = m_{car+water-escaped water}v_{f2} + m_{escaped water}v_{f2}[/tex]

Since [tex]m_{car+water} = m_{car+water-escaped water} + m_{escaped water}[/tex]

[tex]v_{f2} = v_{i2}[/tex]
I'd say that after gaining/losing [itex]\Delta m[/itex] of rain/water:
[tex]m_{car+water}v_{f} = m_{car+water-escaped water}v_{i}[/tex]

Thus:
[tex]v_{f} < v_{i}[/tex]
 
Yup, that's more like it! Or, it's exactly it, rather.

We did have some notion about this actually, though not a clarified one.
 
Bonulo said:
What I wrote to ii) was the result as stated in the solutions we got. There, the speed decreases, as does the momentum and kinetic energy.
That is what I said. In ii) the problem is the same as in i) with the added hole in the bottom letting water out. The added hole in the bottom does not change the velocity. Break it into two parts: 1. rain is captured - this is the same as i) and the speed slows ([itex]v_f<v_i[/itex]. You then take that reduced speed ([itex]v_{i2} = v_f[/itex]) and see if the escape of water changes it. It doesn't. So the car keeps that slower speed [itex]v_{i2} = v_f < v_i[/itex].

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
That is what I said.
Sorry if I misinterpreted what you had said. (I guess I didn't understand your notation.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
907
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K