Raising and lowering operators on a simple harmonic oscillator

qualal
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I'm currently studying for a quantum mechanics exam but I am stuck on a line in my notes:

Ha\left|\Psi\right\rangle =\hbar\omega\left(a^{t}a a + \frac{a}{2}\right)\left|\Psi\right\rangleHa\left|\Psi\right\rangle =\hbar\omega\left(\left(a a^{t} - 1\right)a + \frac{a}{2}\right)\left|\Psi\right\rangle
Where H is the harmonic oscillator hamiltonian

H = \frac{P^{2}}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^{2} x^{2}and a, a^{t} are the lowering and raising operators respectively.

a^{t} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\hbar m \omega}}\left(m \omega x - i p\right)

a= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\hbar m \omega}}\left(m \omega x + i p\right)

The part I don't understand is how they got from a^{t}a a to \left(a a^{t} - 1\right)a

I'm not afraid of doing a bit of calculating but I really need a hint as to what method I should use.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure your first equation is correct?

The Hamiltonian has one of two forms

H=\hbar\omega(aa^t-1/2)

H=\hbar\omega(a^ta+1/2)

Whichever form you use, if you tack on an extra at on the right, you don't end up with what you have. Check your notes farther up.
 
Apologies I mistyped when I wrote

Ha^{t}\left|\Psi\right\rangle

I meant to say Ha\left|\Psi\right\rangle

does this make more sense now?

It now looks just like your second hamiltonian multiplied by "a" to me.
 
Now that you got the first line right, you can get from the first to the second line using the commutator

[a, a^t]=1
 
thanks so much! this has been bothering me all day!

I used \left[ a,a^{t}\right]= a a^{t}-a^{t} a =1

and re-arranged to get

a a^{t}-1=a^{t} a

which I then sub straight into the first line :-)
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top