Random function coupled to a non-random function question.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between a non-random function and a random function within the context of elastodynamics. Participants explore the implications of coupling discrete random variables with continuous deterministic functions, particularly focusing on covariance and correlation functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant is attempting to formulate a theory for elastodynamics and seeks to understand the relationship between a non-random function and a random function, specifically through covariance.
  • Another participant suggests that if B(y) is not random, then the expectation can be simplified to B(y).
  • A participant expresses concern that this simplification leads to centered fluctuations of being zero, indicating a potential limitation in the approach.
  • There is a proposal to consider B(y) as a binary characteristic function that is 1 within a specified volume and 0 otherwise, raising questions about the relationship between the random variables x and y.
  • One participant describes a scenario where both x and y are chosen randomly, and discusses the correlation function in the context of random material property fluctuations, suggesting a specific form for the correlation based on distance.
  • Another participant argues that since y is random, B(y) should also be treated as random, even if it is deterministic, which complicates the simplification suggested earlier.
  • A participant concludes that numerical determination of correlation functions may be necessary given the complexities involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of deterministic functions in the context of random variables. There is no consensus on the best approach to relate these functions, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of treating B(y) as deterministic versus random.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity in the relationship between the random variables x and y, as well as the implications of treating B(y) as deterministic in a random context. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the functions and their interactions that remain unaddressed.

KayBox
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello and thank you in advance for anyone taking time to respond.

I working on formulating a theory for elastodynamics, but my statistics is admittedly weak. I'm trying to find a relationship between a non random function and a random function, for example, the covariance.

<A(x)B(y)>=some 2 point probability for 2 random functions.

These are discrete random variables, so the result is usually calculated numerically or by experimental observation.

The problem I'm having is what if B(y) is non-random (ie deterministic) and continuous (not discrete)? I understand there is a discrete and integral formulation for discrete and continuous functions respectively, but I keep getting stuck. Its like I'm trying to find a connection that shouldn't be there, but they always come up in the formulation. Can anyone give me an idea of where to start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If B(y) is not random, then <A(x)B(y)> = B(y)<A(x)>.
 
Ah, not what I wanted to hear (<A(x)>=0 centered fluctuations).

What if B(y) is a binary characteristic function that is 1 inside a specified volume size within the total volume(though its position is not known) and zero otherwise?
 
KayBox said:
Ah, not what I wanted to hear (<A(x)>=0 centered fluctuations).

What if B(y) is a binary characteristic function that is 1 inside a specified volume size within the total volume(though its position is not known) and zero otherwise?

You need to be specific about the relationship between y and x.
 
y and x are both chosen at random. When A(x) and B(y) correspond to random material property fluctuations, the correlation function is either assumed to be of the form exp(r/L) where r is the absolute distance between the points and L is the average grain size for the polycrystalline material, or is evaluated numerically. When evaluated numerically using a Voronoi tesselation, randomly tossing line segments in the model, then calculating the product produces the numerical result, which is then fitted to some function similar to the assumed form above. Its a measure of the likelihood that the two points are in the same grain.

For this case, x and y are still chosen at random, but only one varies randomly in space. The other is deterministic, in that its center is located in the inspection volume with a its own volume occupied by the foreign material, while the other varies randomly. Its basically an inclusion type problem in a polycrystalline medium. Hope this helps.
 
Since y is random B(y) is random (even if B is deterministic), so you cannot take it outside the bracket.
 
Thanks for your help. Looks like I will have to determine the correlation functions numerically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K