Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread features a collection of random photos shared by participants, encompassing various subjects such as landscapes, wildlife, and personal experiences. The discussion includes comments on the photos, questions about techniques, and reflections on the memories associated with the images.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants share a variety of photos, including landscapes from Central Park, autumn scenery, and wildlife encounters.
  • Some participants inquire about the techniques used to capture certain images, such as whether a photo was taken from a drone or a window.
  • There are discussions about specific details in photos, such as the appearance of clouds and shadows in mountain images.
  • One participant shares a story about a pet cat and relates it to the theme of unpredictability in experiments.
  • Another participant mentions a photo contest and reflects on past submissions and votes received.
  • There is a mention of a specific fungus or mold growing on a branch, with one participant speculating on its identity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share their photos and experiences without reaching a consensus on specific technical aspects or interpretations of the images. Multiple viewpoints and interpretations are present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about photographic techniques and the conditions under which photos were taken, which are not fully explored or resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in photography, nature, and personal storytelling may find the shared experiences and insights valuable.

  • #601
Today I found out how this strip of grass and weeds gets mowed. It contains a drainage ditch, and runs in front of a vacant lot along one side of the street a couple of blocks from my house. I've never seen this particular device before. The operator has to make a couple of passes in order to do both sides of the ditch.

At first I thought it was a city employee, but the vehicle doesn't have the city's logo on it, so now I suspect the property owner must have hired the guy.

mower.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, morrobay, berkeman and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #602
jtbell said:
I've never seen this particular device before.
Here in Montana that's how the state and county crews mow, what's different in your picture is that I don̓t see any caution or warning signs to warn passing motorists and pedestrians. Those mowers will chop off a 3 to 4 inch branch as easily as it will cut a blade of grass, not to mention launching a piece of said branch at lethal velocities. I never see them operating without some type of warning, too much liability. I would assume the operator is a private contractor as most State, County or City departments are very particular about liabilty and insurance. The other clue would be, did the mower only mow the strip in the photo or continue on down the road like a normal city crew would do, completing the area in sections.
 
  • #603
jtbell said:
Today I found out how this strip of grass and weeds gets mowed.
Could you tell what that black box thingie is in the front of the tractor?
 
  • #604
berkeman said:
Could you tell what that black box thingie is in the front of the tractor?
Counterweight most likely, along with the rear wheel weights they are important for stability on uneven surfaces when the mower boom swings. It could also be a hydraulic fluid reservoir which in itself would make a good counterweight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #605
Oldman too said:
Counterweight most likely, along with the rear wheel weights they are important for stability on uneven surfaces when the mower boom swings. It could also be a hydraulic fluid reservoir which in itself would make a good counterweight.
It looks like there may indeed be a counterweight black box thing to the driver's left, but a counterweight on the front would have to be for a heavy appliance on the rear...

1652729127741.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: morrobay
  • #606
berkeman said:
but a counterweight on the front would have to be for a heavy appliance on the rear...
Yes, upon zooming the image I see that the box on the drivers side is definitely the Hydraulic fluid reservoir, that means the box on the front is a counterweight to offset the mowing attachment. (although it could be a beer cooler) :wink:
 
  • #607
berkeman said:
It looks like there may indeed be a counterweight black box thing to the driver's left,
Well, it's just googlework, but apparently this mower is not back, but side mounted. The black box on the other side is the alternative mounting point, while the front monstrosity is the hydraulics pump/tank.
Since it's side mounted, the counterweight is on the other side: it is attached to the rear wheel :smile:
 
  • #608
Rive said:
Since it's side mounted, the counterweight is on the other side: it is attached to the rear wheel
Ah, I wondered what that was. Good catch!

And I like the beer cooler idea better for the front box. :smile:
 
  • #609
Rive said:
Well, it's just googlework, but apparently this mower is not back, but side mounted.
Good googlework, Your correct on the boom mount location, I didn't notice until looking closer. One thing that threw me was that I didn't realize how small the tractor was until looking at the operator in the cab. The front box in that case, very well could be a PTO pump, reservoir. the black box on the right side with the yellow stripe in the top corner is also a main Hydraulic fluid reservoir, but an auxiliary tank would make sense if combined with a front PTO pump. The mower attachment needs a large capacity reservoir to maintain flow and temperature control. If @jtbell gets another chance to get a closer look that would clear up that question, hard to tell as the resolution blows up pretty bad when trying to see details. Pardon the delay in my reply's, having a bad day with connectivity issues.
 
  • #610
Oldman too said:
did the mower only mow the strip in the photo or continue on down the road like a normal city crew would do, completing the area in sections.
I didn't hang around long enough to see what he did at the edge of the vacant property. I'm pretty sure he must have stopped there, because homeowners are responsible for maintaining the city-owned strip of land between their property line and the street. It might look odd if the city did it, but on a different schedule from all the homeowners. Of course, we all do our lawns (or have our lawn guys do them) on different schedules anyway...
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too
  • #611
jtbell said:
I didn't hang around long enough to see what he did at the edge of the vacant property. I'm pretty sure he must have stopped there, because homeowners are responsible for maintaining the city-owned strip of land between their property line and the street. It might look odd if the city did it, but on a different schedule from all the homeowners. Of course, we all do our lawns (or have our lawn guys do them) on different schedules anyway...
Hi @jtbell, Thanks for the answer. The tractor could be a new piece of city equipment or a private contractor, hard to tell. If you get a chance to see the tractor again, there is a question about the black attachment on the front of it. Is it a hydraulic reservoir/pump assembly or a counterweight?
It could be either one and it's hard to tell from the photo that you posted, If you get a chance to check that out it would be greatly appreciated, although not a critical point it is a curiosity that was being discussed. Thanks again, Scott
 
  • #612
While walking my dog I noticed that...

The Flower Boat is Blooming!
IMG_0449.jpg


IMG_0450.jpg
They might want to shake off the cover.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, collinsmark, morrobay and 2 others
  • #613
Low tide, Pattaya bay. South end
IMG_20220519_113749.jpg
IMG_20220519_114624.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and BillTre
  • #614
Looking North from North end of bay.
IMG_20220517_140415.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too and DennisN
  • #615
Same sunset : NW and SW views
IMG_20220523_185956.jpg
IMGIMG_20220523_182751_493.jpg
 
  • #616
DennisN said:
I'm actually thinking of going back to Copenhagen soon, and bring a bike with me on the train and then bike around in the city to places I haven't been to.

I'm thinking of maybe going to the Little Mermaid (which truly is small :smile:, I've been there) and try to take some kind of unusual photo of her if possible (probably in the late evening and with some lighting, or something, I haven't decided yet :smile:).

Yes, the little mermaid is very photogenic. Which might be a way of saying when you go there she is quite disappointing after the photos. (People do often say so.) But if you're going there as a photographer, not just a tourist, you have I hope a lot of time to hang around, consider the various angles of the Sun during the day and the effects achievable with your special Russian lenses etc.

All the better if you were going there with your bike. Not that you need to take a bike to Copenhagen as you already know - I don't know any city so totally dominated by bikes – not even in the Netherlands did I ever see anything like it. But if you have some special bike of your own all the better. Just don't forget and leave it there like Mr Wheeler.

Immagine 665.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: morrobay and DennisN
  • #617
Lucky shot of the day:

DSC_1341 copy.jpg


Perfect focus, too! (1:1 crop)
DSC_1341 copy.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, Borg, epenguin and 7 others
  • #618
Andy Resnick said:
Lucky shot of the day:
A beautiful bird and a beautiful photo! Was it taken with a manual lens or an autofocus lens? And was it a tele or a zoom lens?
 
  • #619
epenguin said:
But if you're going there as a photographer, not just a tourist, you have I hope a lot of time to hang around

epenguin said:
All the better if you were going there with your bike.
I've made a map with places in Copenhagen to visit/photo locations, for instance:

Nyhavn, the nice old waterfront district (I've been there before, but it was probably twenty years ago):

Nyhavn_5-15%2C_Kbh_2020.jpg

Photo by Vincents productions (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)

Niels Bohr Institute (founded by Niels Bohr) (I've never been there):

Niels_Bohr_Institute_1.jpg

Photo by Thue, public domain

Rundetaarn, the 17th-century astronomical tower (I've been there, but I haven't photographed it):

Copenhagen_-_Rundet%C3%A5rn_-_2013.jpg

Photo by Avda (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)

Copenhagen Botanical Garden (I've never been there):

Botanisk-Have-Kbh-190807.jpg

Photo by Henrik Jessen (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, Oldman too, morrobay and 1 other person
  • #620
Street flower (shot during a short lens test yesterday):
02 - Blommor på Friisgatan (Tokina 28mm f2.8 (FD mount)).jpg


Plants escaping the fence (another test shot):
06 - Majtid på Spångatan (Tokina 28mm f2.8 (FD mount)).jpg


I also recently found a new fun glass toy in a second hand store just a block away (this was not the lens I tested above). It's a fast 40mm, which is a pretty uncommon focal length. It's a quite good lens, and the price was merely $12, so of course I bought it. :smile:

Konica Hexanon AR 40mm f/1.8
Konica Hexanon AR 40mm f1.8.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, epenguin, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #621
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, morrobay, Oldman too and 2 others
  • #622
IMG20220529063821.jpg
IMG20220529064138.jpg
 
  • #623
20220528_195721.jpg
 
  • #624
Beautiful Black on Black 🖤🖤🖤
IMG_20220529_193104.jpg
IMG_20220529_192112.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #625
DennisN said:
I've made a map with places in Copenhagen to visit/photo locations, for instance:

Nyhavn, the nice old waterfront district (I've been there before, but it was probably twenty years ago):

View attachment 301967
Photo by Vincents productions (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)

Niels Bohr Institute (founded by Niels Bohr) (I've never been there):

View attachment 301968
Photo by Thue, publ
DennisN said:
I've made a map with places in Copenhagen to visit/photo locations, for instance:

Nyhavn, the nice old waterfront district (I've been there before, but it was probably twenty years ago):

View attachment 301967
Photo by Vincents productions (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)

Niels Bohr Institute (founded by Niels Bohr) (I've never been there):

View attachment 301968
Photo by Thue, public domain

Rundetaarn, the 17th-century astronomical tower (I've been there, but I haven't photographed it):

View attachment 301969
Photo by Avda (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)

Copenhagen Botanical Garden (I've never been there):

View attachment 301970
Photo by Henrik Jessen (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)

I was there mainly for about a week sometime around roughly the same year as you. (Very much later than Mr. Wheeler).

Copenhagen is outstanding for design

Immagine 688.jpg
Immagine 686.jpg
Immagine 685.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and DennisN
  • #626
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too and morrobay
  • #627
A happy lamp :smile: :

Happy Lamp.jpg
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, Ibix, dlgoff and 1 other person
  • #628
A couple of days ago I heard a complaint from one of my cupboards.
It was my macro lens which said "You bought me and tried me at home, you liked me, but you have never took me out anywhere. Why?"

So I took the lens out for a walk.

We found a daisy...
52111226967_7d43bfce0b_o.png


...and then a dandelion seedhead...
52112498469_64ce87d5dd_o.png


...and while we were sitting in the grass we noticed there were bees feeding on flowers, so we took a shot at those, even though we hadn't planned it. It's not easy with a manual lens, you've got between ca 1 - 3 seconds to focus and shoot before the bee takes off (as a result only about 3 out of 45 photos had reasonable focus :smile:).

DSC03969(cropped).png


DSC03990(cropped).png


And when we got home and looked at the photos, we noticed we had accidentally shot an ant climbing up a violet flower:

Myra klättrar på en violett blomma.png


I think the lens is promising also for ants.
I focused on the flower (down below) and not the ant (since I didn't know there was an ant), so with better focus next time, more ant details may come out. :smile:

Lens used: Canon nFD Macro 50mm f/3.5.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, Bystander, BillTre and 5 others
  • #629
DennisN said:
A beautiful bird and a beautiful photo! Was it taken with a manual lens or an autofocus lens? And was it a tele or a zoom lens?

Thanks! Manual focus lens (800mm, shot at f/8). I was standing about 20 feet away from the hummingbird (female ruby-throated hummingbird, FWIW) and it flew off right after the photo.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #630
DennisN said:
I also recently found a new fun glass toy in a second hand store just a block away (this was not the lens I tested above). It's a fast 40mm, which is a pretty uncommon focal length. It's a quite good lens, and the price was merely $12, so of course I bought it. :smile:

Konica Hexanon AR 40mm f/1.8
View attachment 302014
That *is* a great lens, I have one as well!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K