Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread features a collection of random photos shared by participants, encompassing various subjects such as landscapes, wildlife, and personal experiences. The discussion includes comments on the photos, questions about techniques, and reflections on the memories associated with the images.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants share a variety of photos, including landscapes from Central Park, autumn scenery, and wildlife encounters.
  • Some participants inquire about the techniques used to capture certain images, such as whether a photo was taken from a drone or a window.
  • There are discussions about specific details in photos, such as the appearance of clouds and shadows in mountain images.
  • One participant shares a story about a pet cat and relates it to the theme of unpredictability in experiments.
  • Another participant mentions a photo contest and reflects on past submissions and votes received.
  • There is a mention of a specific fungus or mold growing on a branch, with one participant speculating on its identity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share their photos and experiences without reaching a consensus on specific technical aspects or interpretations of the images. Multiple viewpoints and interpretations are present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about photographic techniques and the conditions under which photos were taken, which are not fully explored or resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in photography, nature, and personal storytelling may find the shared experiences and insights valuable.

  • #1,711
"What do you mean it's your bed? We're resting here now."

Katter - m2.jpg


(my two cats shot with smartphone a while ago)

@Rive, by the way, this was shot a while ago and in the evening, and here I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot. If I hadn't done that the photo would have become pretty dull and "greyish" since the ambient light in the room was pretty low in intensity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jtbell, Bystander, pinball1970 and 5 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,712
DennisN said:
@Rive, by the way, this was shot a while ago and in the evening, and here I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot. If I hadn't done that the photo would have become pretty dull and "greyish" since the ambient light in the room was pretty low in intensity.

For comparison, here's another recent shot of one of the cats without using any supporting light (just ambient light)... and the photo becomes more washed out.

It also becomes more difficult to get a sharp shot in low light (due to the camera probably compensating for low light by increasing exposure time, and during longer exposure times tiny movements of my hand holding the smartphone become more apparent).

Katter - m3.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rive, collinsmark, Bystander and 2 others
  • #1,713
DennisN said:
I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot.
I've tried that too, but does not work for black cats:sorry:
It's the same what happens with flash. Everything is already overexposed, while the cat in the middle is still like a black hole... 😭

I think it's about the difference in the dynamic ranges involved. To have the (black) cat proper on the photo, I need sufficient dynamic ranges both on the lower end (cat) and in the middle (background) of the brightness scale in the same time.

Most likely I'll try to explore the dark arts of postprocessing (as was suggested by @jtbell ), against my beliefs and inherent laziness :doh:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #1,714
DennisN said:
I directed an adjustable table lamp towards the cats before I took the shot.
How would they have reacted if you had used the flashlamp? :biggrin:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #1,715
Rive said:
Most likely I'll try to explore the dark arts of postprocessing (as was suggested by @jtbell ), against my beliefs and inherent laziness :doh:
I don't have anything against post. In my wet darkroom days I would dodge and burn, use different contrast filters for different parts of the image, bleach with ferri, and on and on.

Another point: the unprocessed image coming straight out of your digital camera is the result of its software's decisions about how the image should look. In post, you can use your decisions.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint, BillTre, Rive and 1 other person
  • #1,716
jtbell said:
How would they have reacted if you had used the flashlamp? :biggrin:
I haven't seen it myself but, my wife tells a story about her mother taking a flash picture of a cat sleeping on the back of a couch.

Apparently the camera used a short pre-flash to get a reading for the correct exposure (moderately common in those days).

The photo showed the cat in mid-air above the couch!

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, jtbell, Rive and 2 others
  • #1,717
Sometimes the pre-flash was to constrict the subject's pupils, in an attempt to reduce "red eye" in portraits.
 
  • #1,718
I just read this discussion on another forum:

https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=424526

A tiny 1,000 sq. foot fixer-upper in my area starts around $900,000 and $1.2 million is a small starter home 3Bed/3Bath, 1,500 sq. feet.

Here's what $900,000 gets you in my town (photo yesterday afternoon):

bailey-vance.jpg


5 bedrooms, 6 bathrooms, over 4,000 square feet, 2.6 acre lot.

It was built in 1892 for the son of the founder of two of the town's three textile mills, and the town's bank. His wife was the daughter of the founder of the college where my wife and I both taught for many years.

It includes a fallout shelter which I guess was added later.

It ended up owned by the original owner's grandson, who was the chairman of the college's Board of Trustees during part of my time here. When his wife died a few years ago, she bequeathed it to the college.

I've heard that there was a proposal/suggestion that the college's business & economics department start a concentration in "hospitality management" in which students would run the house as a bed and breakfast place.

In the end, the college decided they need the cash, so the house is now up for sale.

I've never been inside it, but my wife was there once, for some college event.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,719
I bought this on line, just for qualitative stuff.

IMG_20240216_143125_241.jpg


It totally works, not tried it on strong acids or bases but great between 4-9.

It was less than £3 so I am not sure what I expected in terms of size.

IMG_20240216_143246_214.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, DennisN and Ibix
  • #1,720
pinball1970 said:
For me, the most interesting thing in the picture is "EXP: 2026-22". 22??
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and pinball1970
  • #1,721
Jonathan Scott said:
For me, the most interesting thing in the picture is "EXP: 2026-22". 22??
Good catch!

02? Typo?
 
  • #1,722
Jonathan Scott said:
For me, the most interesting thing in the picture is "EXP: 2026-22". 22??
Most likely 22nd week
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and berkeman
  • #1,723
pinball1970 said:
I bought this on line, just for qualitative stuff.
How does that work? Is it a one-time use thing?
 
  • #1,724
gmax137 said:
How does that work? Is it a one-time use thing?
It's a roll of litmus paper.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and gmax137
  • #1,725
D'oh!
 
  • #1,726
The busy ice cream place with waiting
IMG20240219175735.jpg
IMG_20240219_192854.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rive and DennisN
  • #1,727
A powerful photo :kiss::

ada7?q=80&w=2669&auto=format&fit=crop&ixlib=rb-4.0.jpg

Photo by Jonatan Pie, quote: "Strolling down the canyon. It was midnight and auroras were bursting, but i was stuck in the canyon, so i tried to make as much use as i can from the position where i was. The idea fell on my mind to light the sides with the torches and another selfie came out :)"

Source: https://unsplash.com/photos/northern-lights-3l3RwQdHRHg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds, pinball1970, Borg and 6 others
  • #1,728
The nice clear Southerlies/South Westerlies coming from across the Gulf and Andaman sea have arrived on schedule. What a difference from those Northerlies coming down from across the polluted , smoky land masses to the North - That air was out to get you
IMG20240221113551.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, collinsmark and Rive
  • #1,729
It's amazing how much extra lean angle the MotoGP riders have been able to achieve the last couple of years. I'm not sure what is different, but they seem to have found an extra 10 degrees of lean angle somehow, which is translating into faster lap times. Amazing! :smile:

@Lnewqban

1708558256920.jpeg

 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban, Rive, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #1,730
This sculpture made of wire and LEDs hangs in the lobby of the performing arts center in Greenville SC. It's more impressive at night, but I wasn't there late enough last Sunday.

IMG_4187.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, morrobay, Rive and 1 other person
  • #1,731
berkeman said:
It's amazing how much extra lean angle the MotoGP riders have been able to achieve the last couple of years. I'm not sure what is different, but they seem to have found an extra 10 degrees of lean angle somehow, which is translating into faster lap times. Amazing! :smile:

@Lnewqban

View attachment 340673

Wow, that looks like about 60 degrees from vertical.

Compare to King Kenny (this is a Daytona photo, probably 1983 or 84). Looks like just a bit more than 45 degrees. I think it is probably down to the rubber compound development.
roberts_daytona.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, BillTre and berkeman
  • #1,732
This rainbow at sunset was too big to capture in one shot, so I tried to stitch two shots in Photoshop, not very successfully.

rainbow.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, pinball1970, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #1,733
Random photos, this is random.

A gig venue, not a student house.

IMG_20240224_164901_829.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Haborix, collinsmark, Rive and 1 other person
  • #1,734
Where we put our gear cases. Didn't expect the ring.

IMG_20240224_175034_553.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, Rive and BillTre
  • #1,735
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Rive, pinball1970 and 1 other person
  • #1,736
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, morrobay, Rive and 1 other person
  • #1,737
pinball1970 said:
Boxing club in the day and rock venue at night.

View attachment 340811

I've heard of famous bands doing weddings and things. This looks more fun though!
Do you know what's really funny in that little talk about gig venues?

"Tote Hose" literally, 'dead trousers' is a German idiom for anything boring, bleaky. "Hier ist ja tote Hose" stands for "here is nothing going on at all" as in someone's trousers - you know what I mean. The band name "Die Toten Hosen" makes fun of this idiom. Now, taking another look at the gym, I have to say: looks like "tote Hose".
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, pinball1970 and gmax137
  • #1,738
fresh_42 said:
. Now, taking another look at the gym, I have to say: looks like "tote Hose".
Different room Fresh! This is gig part.

IMG_20240224_194815_541.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Borg, collinsmark and 4 others
  • #1,739
Rock 'em back on the ropes! :woot:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #1,740
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, morrobay, pinball1970 and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K