Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter Point Conception
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3,857 replies · 224K views
BillTre said:
And almost sure that at least the sky here is AI as well...

[EDIT]

It seems to originate from this facebook account which only seems to post AI fotos of nature:


[/edit]
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rive and renormalize
Physics news on Phys.org
Arjan82 said:
And this is fake staged as well:
Interesting. I saw something about National Geographic photos, and assumed that made them valid. But it looks like that was part of the fakeness, saying that they were from National Geographic. I'll try to be more careful.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arjan82 and phinds
berkeman said:
Interesting. I saw something about National Geographic photos, and assumed that made them valid. But it looks like that was part of the fakeness, saying that they were from National Geographic. I'll try to be more careful.
This is from Bill though! Has someone hacked his account?
 
pinball1970 said:
An earlier image but enhanced.

View attachment 353829
The pub on the right is a mid 16th C building and was removed brick by brick and rebuilt 300 meters away from the original spot, following the 1996 IRA bombing.
Before that the area was redeveloped in the 1970s after surviving the blitz so Manchester pubs seemed to have got a lucky pass.
This is called "Shambles" square. The the square took its name from the butchers and abattoirs which once stood in its place - the blood and guts leftover from slaughter and butchering being known as 'shambles."
 
collinsmark said:
Also, for what it's worth, the Helix Nebula's (NGC 7293) angular diameter is many times larger than the field of view of the HST. Even in principle, it would take a pretty massive mosaic for HST to produce a full representation of the Helix.

But it was captured by Hubble:
1732551763391.png


It looks rather different though :)

The observation with the spitzer telescope comes closer:
1732551827474.png


Here some more and a comparison:
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/videos/1102-Video
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, Rive, pinball1970 and 2 others
Arjan82 said:
But it was captured by Hubble:
View attachment 353877

It looks rather different though :)

The observation with the spitzer telescope comes closer:
View attachment 353878

Here some more and a comparison:
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/videos/1102-Video

Part of it was done by Hubble (i.e., HST). But I don't think the whole thing was. I'm pretty sure the rest was done with a wider field telescope.

Here's an an article from Hubblesite.org:
https://hubblesite.org/contents/news-releases/2003/news-2003-11.html?news=true
STScI-01EVSRZ30N99FFW54XDTG5G8P5.png


"The composite picture is a seamless blend of ultra-sharp images from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope combined with the wide view of the Mosaic Camera on the National Science Foundation's 0.9-meter telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory near Tucson, Ariz."

I'm pretty sure the reason they referenced Hubble in the link you gave, is not to say that HST imaged the whole thing, but rather that they were comparing visible to infrared, and Hubble (HST) is in the visible.

[Edit: By the way, I have new data from my backyard telescope (C14 EdgeHD) of The Helix Nebula in the queue to be processed. It was shot in the visible spectrum, of course, but with narrowband filters. I'll post it in a few weeks in the "Our Beautiful Universe" thread." So far, it looks very promising. It's amazing what you can do with a backyard telescope these days.]
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Arjan82
collinsmark said:
It's amazing what you can do with a backyard telescope these days.
... and high-end software, a knack for artistry, and weeks of free time! :smile:

Nice work @collinsmark.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, BillTre and Borg
The Lass O'Gowrie

IMG_20240907_113743_034.jpg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Astranut, jtbell and 1 other person
Hyde

Evergreens and deciduous

IMG_20241130_152816_321~2.jpg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Astranut, Point Conception and 2 others
This hill beat me, I failed to get a decent Manchester skyline behind me. Next time.

IMG_20241130_154127_690~2.jpg

IMG_20241130_154111_840~2.jpg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Astranut, Point Conception and 3 others
Seafood market today
IMG_20241202_171307.jpg
IMG20241202171918.jpg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, collinsmark, WWGD and 1 other person
Today I did a day-trip to Tampa FL. As I was entering town, heading to the place where I've parked before, I ran into closed streets and detours. Another Christmas parade? No, it was the Ybor City Cigar Festival!

IMG_0850.jpeg

IMG_0851.jpeg

IMG_0852.jpeg
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and collinsmark
If you’ve ever seen in flight refueling before, how hard do you think it is?

It’s harder than it looks, that’s for sure.

Screen_241209_190716.jpeg


Lots of fine adjustments needed to stay in position, both in terms of flight control surfaces and throttles. I think the longest I stayed connected was maybe 10 seconds at a stretch, which for a first try isn’t bad. But hey, I spent enough cumulative time on the boom that I left with more fuel than when I started.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, DennisN, Rive and 4 others
Flyboy said:
If you’ve ever seen in flight refueling before, how hard do you think it is?

It’s harder than it looks, that’s for sure.

View attachment 354331

Lots of fine adjustments needed to stay in position, both in terms of flight control surfaces and throttles. I think the longest I stayed connected was maybe 10 seconds at a stretch, which for a first try isn’t bad. But hey, I spent enough cumulative time on the boom that I left with more fuel than when I started.
Seems pretty easy to me:

santa-refueling.jpg
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, DennisN, Rive and 4 others
Flyboy said:
the longest I stayed connected was maybe 10 seconds at a stretch, which for a first try isn’t bad.
Have you tried other aircraft? That F4 is a flying brick, as you know... :wink:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre