Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a variety of photography topics, showcasing personal photos and experiences from different locations, including Ko-Larn Island, Central Park, and various natural landscapes. Participants share insights about the techniques used in their photography, such as drone shots and long exposure panoramas, and discuss the beauty of nature, including autumn scenes and night skies. There are mentions of personal stories, including a trip to Sweden and memories of family history, particularly relating to military service during WWII. The conversation also touches on the impact of the pandemic on tourism and local businesses, as well as the enjoyment of photography as a creative outlet. Additionally, there are discussions about photography gear, including vintage lenses and new cameras, and the excitement of capturing unique moments like rainbows and wildlife. Overall, the thread highlights the joy of photography and the shared experiences of capturing the world around them.
  • #1,081
Andy Resnick said:
A few preliminary images using crossed polarizers:

View attachment 323975
Caffeine crystals ('psychedelic spaghetti') at 16x

View attachment 323976
Potassium permanganate (also 16x)

View attachment 323977
No

The colors arise because nearly all crystals are birefringent, the total phase difference between ordinary and extraordinary rays ('retardation') is what is visualized as color.

View attachment 323979
Starch grains@ 10X.

View attachment 323980
Tree bark @ 8x

View attachment 323981
Bone (compact, cross section) @ 8x

View attachment 323982
Hair (human, scalp section) @ 4X.
Hello, How exactly is the ' total phase difference between ordinary and extraordinary rays visualized as color? Would that be from constructive/destructive interference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,082
The South West Wind and Cappuccino effect
IMG_20230324_122612.jpg
IMG_20230324_115935.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,083
Andy Resnick said:
A few preliminary images using crossed polarizers:
Very cool photos!

Potassium permanganate (also 16x)
Amazing colors! :smile:

Andy Resnick said:
medium-format film is not a road I am ready to travel down
Hehe, it's another rabbit hole...

I've actually got two medium-format lenses in my collection. They were so cool that I couldn't resist them on an online auction, and I got them quite cheap. They are the oldest lenses I have. But I can't use them since I haven't found any adapter for them. Maybe I'll try building one myself someday, we'll see.

Here they are:

Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 105mm f/3.5 (from the 1950s) (mount: Pentacon Six)
(note the 15 bladed aperture (!), quite cool)

CZJ Tessar 105mm f3.5 (1).jpg


Here beside my camera:
CZJ Tessar 105mm f3.5 (2).jpg


Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 150mm f/4.5
CZJ Tessar 150mm f4.5.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Andy Resnick
  • #1,084
morrobay said:
Hello, How exactly is the ' total phase difference between ordinary and extraordinary rays visualized as color? Would that be from constructive/destructive interference?
Oh sure... ask me to explain something I just learned about :)

(Optical) Minerology is a "delightful" blend of ray and wave optics, the main conclusion of which is the "Michel-Lévy interference color chart" (a good online explanation: https://www.mccrone.com/mm/the-michel-levy-interference-color-chart/). My reference is an excellent book I inherited from my doctoral advisor- lots of diagrams- which is currently in my office. So I don't want to mangle an explanation right now. I'll provide a better explanation shortly.
 
  • #1,086
morrobay said:
Hello, How exactly is the ' total phase difference between ordinary and extraordinary rays visualized as color? Would that be from constructive/destructive interference?
My reference book is "Introduction to the methods of optical crystallography" by Bloss. A viewable PDF version is here: https://archive.org/details/B-001-002-290/page/n111/mode/2up so I'm not going to try and summarize what is an excellent presentation of this subject beginning on page 101.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes morrobay and berkeman
  • #1,087
A fish in an aquarium, somewhat in focus, at least :smile::

Fish.png


Using Google picture search I think it is a "Naso vlamingii".
@BillTre would maybe know if that is correct or not. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Klystron and morrobay
  • #1,088
It could be that. There are a lot of fish.
Was it in a public aquarium? Its kind of large for the normal range of hobbyist sizes of aquaria.
 
  • #1,089
BillTre said:
Was it in a public aquarium?
Yes. It's in a nearby shopping mall. I'd say the dimensions of the aquarium is ca 5 m x 1.5 m x 1.5 m (width, height, depth) and it's built into a wall.
 
  • #1,090
That's big, which is appropriate to that size of fish.
 
  • #1,092
pinball1970 said:
Wow! That is a genuine image? No touch up?
?
 
  • #1,093
BillTre said:
?
Well, you have to admit that the combination of crazy cloud formation, lightning and a rainbow seems a bit implausible, but it could possibly be genuine. That's what he's asking about...

EDIT -- Or maybe no lightning, it's hard to tell...
 
  • #1,094
BillTre said:
?
It is possible to manipulate images, colour, contrast... throw in a vortex etc. These crazy kids can do a lot with images these days.

Your image looked so beautiful and spectacular I had to ask.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and BillTre
  • #1,095
dlgoff said:
I think it might be too dangerous to have him in the cockpit when flying. He would probably freak out.
If it is your daughters dog it would not freak out. A regular dog would but I do not think your daughters dog would.
 
  • #1,096
berkeman said:
Well, you have to admit that the combination of crazy cloud formation, lightning and a rainbow seems a bit implausible, but it could possibly be genuine. That's what he's asking about...

EDIT -- Or maybe no lightning, it's hard to tell...
I would only say check out the link. It may provide some answers, but I wouldn't count on it.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and berkeman
  • #1,097
Sodium Iodide again: "psychadelic tic-tacs":

DSC_0685.jpg


Two conoscopic views through a transparency sheet, showing biaxial structure: the first through crossed linear polarizers, the second obtained by replacing the illuminating polarizer with a circular polarizer (commonly available as polarizers for camera lenses)
DSC_0684.jpg


DSC_0683.jpg


The circular polarizer suppresses the isogyres, leaving only the isochromes. Finally, a very tiny guest showed up, ready for his closeup (reflected DIC method):
DSC_0687.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes collinsmark, nsaspook, morrobay and 3 others
  • #1,098
vLIKWJ7VbCqDjzmQsibLkpU=w1237-h928-s-no?authuser=0.jpg

mRZ0PT37IgroyvujfMUq50M=w1237-h928-s-no?authuser=0.jpg

1Vk244pPTxZsodBewzfWqvQ=w1237-h928-s-no?authuser=0.jpg

Net fishing Smelt on the Sandy River, Oregon.
Screen-Shot-2023-03-28-at-4.19.19-PM.png
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, DennisN, morrobay and 3 others
  • #1,099
BillTre said:
I vote a composite of either 2 or 3 images and maybe some manual touch-up.
Based on:
1. Apparent Solar position seems incompatible between lower and upper mushroom clouds. Sun position of lower mushroom and low clouds on the right seem 90° to the right, while upper cloud deck seems roughly 120° to the right (with the camera at 0°).

2. The multicolor features are not compatible with either Sun position. Rainbows are about 138° from the Sun.
2A. The multicolor could be reflections/refractions from ice crystals (think Sun Dogs) but, the intensity of the illuminate would have to be several times that of the Sun.

3. The Blue area to the upper right of the multicolor feature has sharp edges at the top and sides with neat 90° corners.

4. The shadows cast by the ground cover do not seem compatible between the left and the right of the road. The shadows to the right reach to the left and away from the camera. The shadows on the left point parallel to the road towards the camera.

(Whew! Photo Forensics is time-consuming.)

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. still an impressive image though
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes berkeman, pinball1970 and BillTre
  • #1,100
Something unusual this time, at least for me... a couple of black and white photos.

A nice place at the canal:

Panorama 1 (Canon nFD 28mm f2.8).png


A cool tree in the park:

A cool tree (Canon nFD 28mm f2.8).png


Another place at the canal:

Panorama 2 (Canon nFD 28mm f2.8).png


All three are stitched from multiple photos taken with Canon nFD 28mm f/2.8.
I also used an orange (or maybe red, I don't remember) filter, which increases contrast when shooting black and white (another trick I learned from somewhere). It helps for instance to get more details in skies.

In fact, yellow, orange and red filters all do this for black and white photography; yellow does it somewhat and orange or red do it more.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, nsaspook, morrobay and 2 others
  • #1,101
gGKq3VCp538VAZA17A_zAI0=w1920-h907-s-no?authuser=0.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes jtbell, collinsmark, DennisN and 2 others
  • #1,102
pinball1970 said:
If it is your daughters dog it would not freak out. A regular dog would but I do not think your daughters dog would.
It's her dog. But I wouldn't want her to take that chance.
 
  • #1,103
dlgoff said:
It's her dog. But I wouldn't want her to take that chance.
I know. Tongue in cheek.
 
  • #1,104
One kg shrimp being steamed. About $8.Radioactive Orange
IMG20230404114735.jpg
 
  • #1,105
We don't need to go to the Masters golf tournament (a couple hours drive from here) to see azaleas. We can just look out our window.

azaleas.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, collinsmark, morrobay and 3 others
  • #1,106
The photos I took using the transparency sheet came out so well, I wondered what would happen if I used a 2-ply version, with relative orientations of 45 or 90 degrees between the sheets:

here's 45 degrees:
1680713098458.png


and 90 degrees:
1680713126035.png


Then, just to play around, I replaced the illumination polarizer with a 'varicolor' filter (red-blue, by Cokin). It's hard to describe the optical effect of the varicolor filter, it has a polarizer and the color switches from blue-red as the filter is rotated: https://www.focuscamera.com/cokin-a171-varicolor-red-blue-filter.html

Using the varicolor filter as my illuminating polarizer, I get results like this:
1680713472187.png


it's very weird. Fun to play with!
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, BillTre, DennisN and 2 others
  • #1,107
  • Like
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, TonyStewart, collinsmark and 3 others
  • #1,108
IMG_20230408_084003.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #1,109
A group of Thai girls , 2000's
IMG_20230408_084731.jpg
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes nsaspook and DennisN
  • #1,110
A red and yellow tulip in front of a grave (taken in May 2022):

Red and yellow tulip in front of a grave.png

(Lens used: Helios 44M7)
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, berkeman and morrobay

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K