Do you have an example of a truly random phenomenon?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "truly random" phenomena, exploring examples and definitions of randomness outside of quantum physics. Participants debate the nature of randomness, its implications in physics, and whether certain processes can be considered truly random or merely unpredictable.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that if all data about a phenomenon were known, it could theoretically be predicted, questioning the existence of truly random phenomena outside quantum mechanics.
  • Others suggest that radioactive decay might be an example of randomness, although it is debated whether this falls under quantum phenomena.
  • A participant raises the idea of deterministic chaos, questioning if unpredictability in chaotic systems could be considered true randomness.
  • There is a discussion about the origins of probability and randomness in gambling, with some asserting that true randomness requires outcomes that are unpredictable even to the most knowledgeable observers.
  • One participant claims that randomness is a mathematical concept and suggests that the discussion may not lead to useful conclusions.
  • Another proposes a method involving Johnson white noise sources to generate unpredictable bits, emphasizing the challenges of achieving true randomness in computing.
  • Concerns are raised about the practical implications of randomness in physics and whether certain processes can be deemed random or merely random enough for practical purposes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the definition and existence of truly random phenomena, with no consensus reached on what constitutes true randomness outside quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of defining randomness, with discussions highlighting the dependence on interpretations of determinism, chaos, and the role of quantum mechanics. The limitations of practical examples and the implications of manipulation in experiments are also noted.

  • #121
The_Baron said:
I mean that if we had all of the data we could have on the phenomena, then even theortically it will still be random.
I have real trouble with the format of this discussion board. Nonetheless, on the grandest scale the universe is random, random as the expansion and creation of new synapses and thought paths in the brain with new, especially original thought. At the inception of a seemingly intentional thought, was the thought to carry out, or even conceive of the intent, random? Is photon distribution in the Slit Experiment, random? So in the random but contained expansion of the universe, there is order universally in universal randomness. Yin & Yang, I reckon. Like it's getting to the philosophy of science/physics.

Mu
 
  • Wow
  • Skeptical
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: gentzen, George Keeling and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
Automaticsteam said:
I have real trouble with the format of this discussion board.
I love the format of this 'discussion board'. It's briliiant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen and sophiecentaur
  • #123
Automaticsteam said:
Like it's getting to the philosophy of science/physics.
And in a random act of kindness, this long thread is now done. Thanks everybody for your contributions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen, George Keeling and sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
990
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K