What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
11,071 replies · 646K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Read this somewhere:
My sister is pregnant , but I don't know if it is a boy or girl, so I don't know if I am going to be an aunt or an uncle...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and QuantumQuest
nuuskur said:
I am doubting elementary stuff like
[tex] Y = Y_0\oplus Y_1 \Rightarrow Y/Y_0 \cong Y_1[/tex]
Not feeling well today 🤢
Iirc, it has to see with the associated SES splitting.
 
This guy still walking around in Sandals, shorts and t-shirt. I told him: " Let it go, man, Summer is over. I was sad too. " But there is hope with global warming, not(with)standing Greta (Nor Hansel, I guess).
 
Tv is not always bad. Just watched, i.e. listened to a lecture by a Harvard anthropologist about the decline of various civilizations (Maya, Easter Islands, a certain conflict in the medieval Japan, etc.). It was very interesting and completely up to date. He closed with the statement that he is cautiously optimistic, because nowadays we have several communication networks which allow us to learn from catastrophes elsewhere and elsewhen.

I was stunned as they said at the end that it was from 2005. I would like to ask him whether he is still optimistic.
 
fresh_42 said:
Tv is not always bad. Just watched, i.e. listened to a lecture by a Harvard anthropologist about the decline of various civilizations (Maya, Easter Islands, a certain conflict in the medieval Japan, etc.). It was very interesting and completely up to date. He closed with the statement that he is cautiously optimistic, because nowadays we have several communication networks which allow us to learn from catastrophes elsewhere and elsewhen.

I was stunned as they said at the end that it was from 2005. I would like to ask him whether he is still optimistic.
Sad thing is channels like nat geo, discovery, which intended to provide serious programs ended up jumping the shark because,it seems, people today only want entertainment and not having to do any serious thinking.
 
WWGD said:
Sad thing is channels like nat geo, discovery, which intended to provide serious programs ended up jumping the shark because,it seems, people today only want entertainment and not having to do any serious thinking.
That's the European luxury of having public channels which are paid per general fees. The only disadvantage is that they are broadcast at weird times. (We do not call it socialism here, we call it public interest of education and culture. We believe that our administration has the duty to keep the population educated, at least in principle. A cop once told me that people have the right to be stupid.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
fresh_42 said:
That's the European luxury of having public channels which are paid per general fees. The only disadvantage is that they are broadcast at weird times. (We do not call it socialism here, we call it public interest of education and culture. We believe that our administration has the duty to keep the population educated, at least in principle. A cop once told me that people have the right to be stupid.)
Almost every country, AFAIK, has its own Public Television System, likely for that reason.
 
Time is often considered as a dimension on its own right. With all the confusing and disturbing quantum paradox-like experiments it just happened to me - how 'thick' is the 'present' actually? :woot:
 
Rive said:
Time is often considered as a dimension on its own right. With all the confusing and disturbing quantum paradox-like experiments it just happened to me - how 'thick' is the 'present' actually? :woot:
I have always been curious to work out the topology of space-time, but was always too busy ( i.e., too lazy) to work it out, or even to look it up.
 
fresh_42 said:
$7 for a 48h access and $72 for a download, only to see whether a paper from 1937 is the one everybody refers to when they say: "... proved 1937, that ..."

Ridiculous.
Doesn't your institution pay for access? Most "non-trivial" institutions get access.
 
I get triggered every time I see an action denoted by ##\lambda . v##, what's wrong with ##\lambda\cdot v##? :( e.g multiplying vector with a scalar i.e ring action on an abelian group.
 
fresh_42 said:
Just had a W10 update. 30 min. restart and 20 min. waiting until the background programs gave back enough CPU and memory to work with ...
Aren't updates optional beyond Win 8 or so? Or should you really do them, maybe for security patches?
 
WWGD said:
Aren't updates optional beyond Win 8 or so? Or should you really do them, maybe for security patches?
I guess you can avoid them, but then they will get on your nerves with permanent reminders, and if you don't pay attention during shutdowns, installation starts. With W10 even the small rest of transparency has gone. In W7 I could still decide what to update and what not. E.g. I don't need their Java version (forgot how they name their nonsense, something with framework IIRC.) Now it's only update now or postpone it. And postponing it forever sucks. If my early Linux experiences hadn't been so troublesome I would certainly use Linux. But I only know the early versions where you had to be a Linux expert before using it. I always only used it from time to time, so I never get used to it completely. And I fear that I will end up with a Windows emulation in order to get all my old programs running. So I keep watching how W10 trashes my HD with big installations and braking the performance. I see the day coming I reinstall my W7 copy.