Range Equation Limitation question

  • Thread starter Thread starter astropi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Range
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the limitations of the range equation in projectile motion, specifically in the context of a baseball being hit and caught at the same height. The original poster questions why the range equation seems to fail in providing the correct launch angle despite textbooks stating it should work when launch and final heights are equal.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions under which the range equation is applicable and question the original poster's assumptions about its limitations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the range equation and its relationship with launch angles, suggesting that multiple angles can yield the same range. Others have asked clarifying questions regarding the definitions and values used in the original poster's example, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the problem may be over-determined, and participants are questioning the definitions of variables such as range and the conditions of the projectile motion scenario.

astropi
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


First off, this is NOT a homework problem. I do not need an actual "answer", but I do have a conceptual question. Here it is:

Consider a projectile motion problem such as a baseball being hit. Assume that it is hit and caught at the same height above the ground. In this instance, I believe that the range equation will NOT work. Why not? Most textbooks claim that the so-called range equation works as long as the launch height and final height are equal. However, in such an instance, the range equation fails to give the correct launch angle.

Homework Equations


R = v_o^2/g * sin (2*\Theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In what way it will not work? What makes you believe this?
 
Why shouldn't it work?
The proof and hence the equation does not depend on the height as long as max Height is not so high that their are changes in g.
I think your confusion lies in the fact that the same range can be obtained from two different angles ##\theta \ and \ \pi/2##
An interesting animation:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0H-rv9XFHk
 
Last edited:
I figured it would work, and am uncertain why it does not, or where I made an error. For example, consider the following: R = 35 m, t = 3.2s, y_o = 1.4 m, v_o = 19 m/s with v_y = 16 and v_x = 11, therefore theta = 55 degrees (by the way these values are from an old exam). The range formula does not properly compute theta, unless I made a silly error in which case I would like it pointed out. Thank you!
 
You don't need the range formula for finding ##\theta##.
Use the fact ##v_y/v_x=tan(\theta)##
EDT-And the answer should be ##55.49^o##
 
Last edited:
Enigman said:
You don't need the range formula for finding ##\theta##.
Use the fact ##v_y/v_x=tan(\theta)##

Yes, I know that, thank you. However, that is not my question. My question is: why does the range equation not give you the correct value for theta?
 
What did you take g as?
 
astropi said:
Yes, I know that, thank you. However, that is not my question. My question is: why does the range equation not give you the correct value for theta?

It does! But there are two possible angles that satisfy the equation, and your "solving" it returned only one of the two, corresponding to the principal value returned by the sin-1 function. To get the other value, a little trig is involved. Consider the following situation on the unit circle:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=62240&stc=1&d=1380292338

Two angles, ##\alpha## and ##\alpha '## will yield the same value for sine. The definition of the range and domain of the inverse sine function means it returns only the angle in the first quadrant. It's up to you to determine what ##\alpha '## is from there, if ##\alpha '## is the angle you need.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 521
astropi said:
I figured it would work, and am uncertain why it does not, or where I made an error. For example, consider the following: R = 35 m, t = 3.2s, y_o = 1.4 m, v_o = 19 m/s with v_y = 16 and v_x = 11, therefore theta = 55 degrees (by the way these values are from an old exam). The range formula does not properly compute theta, unless I made a silly error in which case I would like it pointed out. Thank you!

What is the actual text of the problem?
How is R defined here? Does it say that the end point is at the same height as the initial point?
It looks over-determined.

And what Gneill said, for sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K