MHB Ratio of the Area of Similar Polygons

AI Thread Summary
The perimeter of the smaller polygon is calculated to be 39 cm, confirming the initial finding. The ratio of the lengths of the corresponding sides of the similar polygons is 3 to 7. Consequently, the ratio of their areas is determined to be 9 to 49, as area scales with the square of the linear dimensions. This relationship highlights the consistent proportionality between similar shapes. Understanding these ratios is essential for solving problems involving similar polygons.
Hobbes1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Two corresponding sides of two similar polygons have lengths 3 and 7. the perimeter of the larger polygon is 91 cm. What is the perimeter of the smaller polygon? What is the ratio of their areas?

I believe I have found the perimeter of the smaller polygon (39), but I can't figure out the areas.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I will use the subscript $S$ for the smaller polygon, and $L$ for the larger...

For similar planar shapes, the ratio of any corresponding linear measures will be the same. And so the perimeter $P_S$ of the smaller polygon will be:

$$P_S=\frac{3}{7}P_L=\frac{3}{7}\cdot91=\frac{3\cdot7\cdot13}{7}=3\cdot13=39$$

So, you did find the correct value there. (Yes)

Because the area of a planar shape varies as the square of any of its linear measures, then we will find:

$$\frac{A_S}{A_L}=\left(\frac{3}{7}\right)^2=\frac{9}{49}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top