RC Circuit: Charges faster than discharges?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of RC circuits, specifically focusing on the observation that capacitors appear to charge faster than they discharge. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the time constants involved, which are typically defined by the formula T=RC.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differences in time constants during charging and discharging, questioning whether these differences can be attributed to experimental error or variations in circuit conditions. They discuss the potential impact of circuit components and configurations on the observed behavior.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into possible reasons for the observed differences in time constants. Some suggest that additional resistances or variations in circuit paths may contribute to the phenomenon, while others express curiosity about the specific circuit setup used in the lab.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the lab did not provide extensive coverage of the relevant concepts, leading to uncertainty about the factors influencing the charging and discharging processes. There is also mention of potential stray resistances and the physical condition of components affecting the results.

Frozen Stair
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This isn't a problem from a textbook, but it is homework.
For a lab in class, we worked with simple RC circuits on breadboards. The strange thing I noticed is that the capacitor always charges faster than it discharges. I know that the Time constant should be T=RC, so I don't understand why the time constants would differ.

Could someone give a plausible explanation for why this is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it it's a small effect - but not accounted for by experimental error?
Take a closer look at the differences between the circuits?

The time constants are different because conditions are different.
The charging circuit has an extra component in it - and, I'm guessing, one of the other components is in a different state.
The details of the components can matter - what is the cap made of? The resistor? The voltage source? How do all these things affect the circuit?
 
Simon, the difference in time constants is *very* obvious -it can't be accounted for by experimental error.
Strangely, when charging, the time constant calculated from T=RC is accurately depicted in the graph ("nearly" completely charged at 5T). But when discharging, there's a dramatic difference.

I actually can't find the answers to those questions because my class didn't spend much time on the lab. Is there anything that could potentially make a dramatic difference?
I'm just curious.
 
In the typical setup, the cap discharges through a different path to the charging.
An extra resistance on that path would give a longer time constant for discharge than charge. An uncontrolled resistance like this is called a "stray" resistance. It could be that you discharged the cap through a different physical resistor than you charged it? Even if they are rated the same value, they may be physically different - especially if the equipment is old. Similarly, there may be longer wires on the discharging side of the circuit or some of the connections were bad on that side.

Without knowing the details of the circuit I can only guess.
Also see:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080127041137AAmZRlq

... an electrolytic capacitor requires a bit extra work to polarize the dielectric which can present as a different resistance charging to discharging but I don't know the details off-hand (it's been a while).
 
Frozen Stair said:
The strange thing I noticed is that the capacitor always charges faster than it discharges.

What was the circuit used?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
4K