Real analysis Help - Intermediate Value Thrm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating the existence of a solution to the equation 2^x = 3x within the interval (0,1) using the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT). The context is real analysis, focusing on continuity and the properties of functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the IVT by evaluating the functions 2^x and 3x at the endpoints of the interval. Another participant suggests defining a new function f(x) = 2^x - 3x to facilitate the application of the theorem. There is discussion about the continuity of the functions involved and the implications of their signs at the endpoints.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to applying the IVT, with some confirming the validity of evaluating the function at the endpoints. There is a recognition of the need to adhere to the constraints of what has been covered in class, leading to a focus on continuity and the properties of the defined functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that they are restricted to using concepts that have been discussed in class, which may limit the methods available for proving the existence of the solution.

CrazyCalcGirl
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use the Intermediate Value Theorem to show that the equation 2^x=3x has a solution c element of (0,1)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

Ok I know this theorem is usually very easy, but I've never done one where I couldn't easily solve for x and plug in the end points to look for a sign change. I already graphed 2^x and 3x on my calculator and found that there is a solution in (0,1) now I just need to prove it.

My only thoughts were this

let f(x)= 2^x
Let g(x) = 3x

f(0)=2^0=1 and f(1)=2^1=2
g(0)=3x0=0 and G(1)= 3x1=3

f(0)>g(0) and f(1)<g(1) so this means at some point they must cross each other and there must exist c element of (0,1) such that 2^x=3x.

Is this even right at all or anyone have a better idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do this trick a lot in analysis when considering two functions being equal at a point or on an interval:

Define
[tex]f(x):=2^x-3x[/tex]

What do you know about the sum of two continuous functions? Or rather, the sum of a continuous function and a multiple of a continuous function?
 
Last edited:
I know the sum of two continuous functions is continuous and same for a multiple, but I don't see how this applies to me using the IVT. The problems requires I use that theorem.

If you think the way I did it is wrong how about this...?

If I use your idea to let f(x)= 2^x-3x now I can just plug in the endpoints of my interval.

f(0)=1
f(1)=-1

Since they have opposite signs the IVT says there must be a real root c in (0,1).

We just got into continuity and we haven't actually learned anything about sums or multiples yet. We are not allowed to use anything on the homework we have not done in class.
 
By Plugging in the endpoints, you are correct =]
 
hmm both ways I did it I plugged in the endpoints.. so if the first way correct that I originally posted or is the second way correct where you set f(x)= 2^x-3x?

Thanks : )
 
CrazyCalcGirl said:
If I use your idea to let f(x)= 2^x-3x now I can just plug in the endpoints of my interval.

f(0)=1
f(1)=-1

Since they have opposite signs the IVT says there must be a real root c in (0,1).

That is the correct part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K