Real Analysis: Proving Equivalence of f 1-1 & f(A n B) = f(A) n f(B)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equivalence of two statements regarding a function f: S → T. The original poster attempts to show that f is injective if and only if f(A ∩ B) = f(A) ∩ f(B) for all subsets A and B of S.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster begins by assuming f is injective and attempts to demonstrate the containment of f(A ∩ B) and f(A) ∩ f(B). They then switch to assuming the equality of the two sets and explore how to show that f is injective from this assumption. Some participants suggest specific choices for sets A and B to simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing suggestions and the original poster indicating progress in their understanding. They mention proving the contrapositive as part of their reasoning, reflecting an engagement with logical concepts.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to connect their findings regarding f(x) = f(y) with the set equality, indicating a potential gap in their reasoning process. The nature of the problem suggests a focus on logical implications and set theory.

Tangent...
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to show equivalence of two statements:

Let f:S-->T be a function, show that f is 1-1 (injective) is equivalent to f(A n B) = f(A) n f(B) for all A,B subsets of S.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know equivalence means iff, so I started by assuming f is 1-1 and showing f(A n B) = f(A) n f(B) by showing containment both ways (I think I did that part right, since f(A n B) subset of f(A) n f(B) is easy, and f(A) n f(B) subset of f(A n B) uses the fact that f is 1-1).

Now I assume f(A n B) = f(A) n f(B) and try to show f is 1-1. I let x,y be elements of S such that f(x) = f(y). And I don't know where to go from here. I guess I don't know how to combine f(x) = f(y) and f(A n B) = f(A) n f(B) but I'm pretty sure I have to, somehow. Any tips would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps let A={x} and B={y}?
 
Or maybe A={x} and B=S-{x}.
 
Thanks for the replies, I think I figured it out a way to do it. Since it is p iff q, and I can prove if p then q, for the if q then p I just proved the contrapositive, if not p then not q. This should be valid, right? Logic is confusing :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K