MHB Real conjugates of complex numbers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of conjugates of complex numbers, specifically questioning the existence and validity of "real conjugates." It is clarified that the standard conjugate of a complex number is its imaginary conjugate, which reflects across the real axis, while the proposed real conjugates reflect across the imaginary axis. The key point made is that complex conjugation preserves both addition and multiplication, whereas the proposed real conjugation does not maintain these properties. Therefore, while the idea of real conjugates can be considered, it is not practically useful in the context of complex number operations. The consensus is that when referring to a conjugate of a complex number, it is typically understood to mean the imaginary conjugate.
samir
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi!

We have discussed complex numbers in class and their conjugates. From what I understand only the imaginary unit is conjugated. But I wonder if there are such things as real conjugates of complex numbers?

Given the following points:

$$A=(-2+i)$$
$$B=(2+3i)$$
$$C=(-4-3i)$$
$$D=(-4+i)$$

I would argue that their imaginary conjugates are:

$$\overline{A}=(-2-i)$$
$$\overline{B}=(2-3i)$$
$$\overline{C}=(-4+3i)$$
$$\overline{D}=(4-i)$$

I would argue that their real conjugates are:

$$\overline{A}=(2+i)$$
$$\overline{B}=(-2+3i)$$
$$\overline{C}=(4-3i)$$
$$\overline{D}=(4+i)$$

Are these valid statements? Do we ever seek real conjugates of complex numbers? If not, why not? If a problem description only states that we seek a "conjugate" of a complex number, is it always implied that it is the imaginary conjugate we seek?

I have plotted the imaginary conjugates in the following image. (You will have to "imagine" the real conjugates.)

View attachment 5481
 

Attachments

  • 2016-04-04-im-conjugate.png
    2016-04-04-im-conjugate.png
    12.4 KB · Views: 106
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think I understand what you are trying to say, but no: such a concept is hardly ever used.

One can think of conjugation as reflection about the real axis, and (from symmetry) one might want to investigate the usefulness of reflection about the imaginary axis.

As far as *addition* goes, they appear to be on equal footing (this is in keeping with regarding complex numbers as a two-dimensional vector space over the reals-that is, the Argand plane). But the reflection you are considering isn't as useful as "normal" conjugation for this very important reason:

Complex conjugation respects complex multiplication AS WELL AS addition. That is:

$\overline{zw} = \overline{z}\cdot \overline{w}$.

This is NOT the case for the "other reflection".

For example, let's multiply $2 + 3i$ and $1 - i$:

$(2 + 3i)(1 - i) = 2 - 2i + 3i -3i^2 = 2 - i - (-3) = 5 + i$.

Reflecting across the imaginary axis, we have $-5 + i$.

If we reflect both complex numbers first, we have: $-2 + 3i$ and $-1 - i$. Now we multiply and get:

$(-2 + 3i)(-1 - i) = (-2)(-1) + (-2)(-i) + 3i(-1) - 3i^2 = 2 + 2i - 3i - (-2) = 5 - i$.

As you can see the two results are not equal.

It turns out that the map $z \mapsto \overline{z}$ (or $a + ib \mapsto a - ib$, if you prefer) preserves the field structure of the complex numbers, and $a + ib \mapsto -a + ib$ does not. Put another way, in $\Bbb C$, the complex numbers $i$ and $-i = i^3 = \dfrac{1}{i}$ are interchangeable (if we do so "globally"), but $1$ and $-1$ have DIFFERENT algebraic properties ($1$ is the multiplicative identity, $-1$ is not), and switching them "ruins multiplication".
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top