Real gas tables: isentropic work

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of calculating thermodynamic properties and isentropic work for dry air using real gas tables. Participants explore issues related to data accuracy, methods for computation, and the availability of reliable thermodynamic property tables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, kandelabr, describes difficulties in calculating isentropic work due to discrepancies in real gas tables, particularly regarding heat capacity (cp) and enthalpy values.
  • Kandelabr notes that multiple methods yield inconsistent results for isentropic work, indicating potential errors in the data being used.
  • Another participant expresses frustration over the lack of accessible data on real gases and questions how practical applications like high-pressure compressors are designed without accurate information.
  • A suggestion is made to consider purchasing the REFPROP database from NIST, which is reported to be reliable and compatible with software like Excel and potentially Matlab.
  • A later reply indicates that using more precise tables resolved the issues previously encountered with the calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a shared concern regarding the accuracy of available thermodynamic data for real gases. However, there is no consensus on the best approach to obtain reliable data or resolve the discrepancies in calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific methods and equations for calculating thermodynamic properties, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying issues with data accuracy or the methods used.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineers, researchers, or students working with thermodynamic properties of gases, particularly in applications involving real gas behavior and isentropic processes.

kandelabr
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I am writing a Matlab program for calculating properties and processes of dry air using real gas tables. The only tables I could find were from Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook (7th edition, 1999).
Mostly I make use of cubic interpolation and in some critical cases numerical differentiation and integration of thermodynamic equations (for instance, calculating entropy from equation of state and cp tables).

First, I think I found a few mistakes in the tables and I guess there is even more of them.
This is a surface plot of cp (heat capacity at constant pressure); temperature 240-500 K and pressure 1 – 500 bar:

rawcp.jpg


If I filter the peak out and correct the two values where graph doesn't rise continuously (using interpolation), I get this:

intcp.jpg


But, if I calculate cp using equation cp = dh/dT (I also have an enthalpy table), the surface looks like this:

dhcp.jpg


Now there must be something wrong either with enthalpy table or cp table or with whatever table;
Second, I cannot calculate isentropic work of gas.
I am given the temperature and pressure at the beginning (T1, p1), and volume ratio (vr = v2/v1) (I am using volume ratio because I am developing a volumetric expander).

I tried 6 (six!) different approaches (I can post the code of all of them, If you want), but the results are definitely wrong since every method gives different results for the same start parameters.

The following graph shows work for T1 = 400K, vr = 2 and p1 goes from 15 bar to 500 bar.
The red method uses only equation of state (ideal gas equation and interpolation of factor of compressibility from tables) and a heap of numerical equation solving.
The blue is the most brutal way, which means using a while loop to add up temperatures bit by bit until the desired volume is reached.
Work of ideal gas would be drawn as a horizontal line at around 7x104 J/kg. Keep in mind that this is not one expansion but a series of expansions, each starting at a different pressure p1, which is on horizontal axis.

wbe.jpg


This seems like a total nonsense. If it is of any help, this is the final temperature after expansions:

Tbe.jpg


So, my options are few:
- acquire better data from somewhere
- invent yet another method of calculating isentropic work (seems not a very good idea).

So, do you know where could I get thermodynamic properties of dry air? I only need volumes and specific heats (other tables would be welcome, though). Accuracy is critical!

Thank you,
kandelabr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hardly believe there is no one who has ever worked with real gases. How do you build a high pressure compressor? A diving cylinder? An air gun?
Using ideal gas and miss the numbers by 40%?

It's not only these forums. I can't find any data on the net (except that book), there is no book in our library (which is not too small), no real gas equations-of-state coefficients (Redlich-Kwong, Benedict-Webb-Rubin, virial equations), nothing, nothing. I feel like I was doing some basic research.
 
kandelabr said:
I hardly believe there is no one who has ever worked with real gases. How do you build a high pressure compressor? A diving cylinder? An air gun?
Using ideal gas and miss the numbers by 40%?

It's not only these forums. I can't find any data on the net (except that book), there is no book in our library (which is not too small), no real gas equations-of-state coefficients (Redlich-Kwong, Benedict-Webb-Rubin, virial equations), nothing, nothing. I feel like I was doing some basic research.
Hi kandelabr,
The company I work for has their own thermophysical fluids database and I'm sure many other companies do also. But you can purchase a database from NIST called REFPROP for $200 or $300.
http://www.nist.gov/srd/nist23.cfm

I've used it and it's very similar to the one we have. You can link it to EXCEL and I believe to Matlab too, but I haven't used it with Matlab.
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div838/theory/refprop/Frequently_asked_questions.htm#MatLabApplications
 
Thank you for your answer!
Got it!

(no further questions)
 
Last edited:
Just FYI: it was the data. the same code on more precise tables works very well.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
813
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K