Realization we are moving in a system

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of motion in a two-body system, specifically regarding the realization of movement relative to a center of mass (CoM). The participants explore how, without an external reference frame, it becomes challenging to define the motion of the CoM. They conclude that the perception of motion is inherently relative, relying on the presence of a third body or inertial reference frame to establish a definitive understanding of movement through space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of center of mass (CoM)
  • Knowledge of inertial reference frames
  • Basic grasp of orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of relative motion in physics
  • Study the concept of inertial reference frames in detail
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of center of mass in multi-body systems
  • Investigate the implications of motion in non-inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the principles of motion and reference frames in celestial mechanics.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Hello, I am having one question about whether we can realize we are moving in a system, or we think that everything around us is moving away from us.
This question popped up while I was thinking about two let's say planets, orbiting each other... If we are to live on one of them, we'd probably be able to see that the other is moving around us... and doing the calculations in relative coordinates we could understand we are also moving around our CM...
However, what about the motion of the CM? In what way could we "realize" that we are not just orbiting each other, but we are also moving through the whole space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is no third body with which to compare, there is no good way to define the "motion" of the center of mass. As far as the 2 bodies are concerned, the center of mass is stationary. If there is a third body (I'm using this third body to mean an inertial reference frame), we can talk about motion of the center of mass of the 2 bodies with respect to the third one. But if no such third body exists, there's only arbitrary ways to define the CoM motion by arbitrary construction of arbitrary inertial reference frames.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K