Time intervals measured by stationary and moving observers

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
43 replies · 4K views
PeterDonis said:
The definitions of "reference point" and "variable point" are that the reference point is where you calculate the derivative and the variable point is not.

Note that you could switch frames and do the calculation in the primed frame; then ##v'## would be the reference point and ##v## would be the variable point. Either choice is fine, but once you've made the choice you have to apply it consistently.
Thank you very much for your reply. What do you mean by "you have to apply it consistently"? Thank you again.
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
on Phys.org
Hak said:
What do you mean by "you have to apply it consistently"?
I mean that once you have picked a reference frame, that defines for you which point is the "reference point" and which point is the "variable point". You don't have any choice then about which is which.
 
PeterDonis said:
I mean that once you have picked a reference frame, that defines for you which point is the "reference point" and which point is the "variable point". You don't have any choice then about which is which.
Thank you very much. Sure, I agree. I am still, however, confused. When I had asked which definition of ##x## and ##a## was correct, @PeroK replied "##x = v'^2## and ##a = v^2##", not that the interchanged ones (i.e. ##x = v^2## and ##a = v'^2##) were fine too. In the light of what you told me, why are my calculations incorrect in post #21? Have I not been consistent with my choice of reference? Try looking at post #21 and, if you can and want to, let me know. Thank you very much again.
 
Hak said:
When I had asked which definition of ##x## and ##a## was correct, @PeroK replied "##x = v'^2## and ##a = v^2##"
That's because he knew you were using the unprimed reference frame.

Hak said:
not that the interchanged ones (i.e. ##x = v^2## and ##a = v'^2##) were fine too.
That's because they're not fine if you have already chosen the unprimed reference frame.

Hak said:
In the light of what you told me, why are my calculations incorrect in post #21? Have I not been consistent with my choice of reference?
Obviously not, because in post #21 you switched reference frames (you didn't realize that's what you were doing when you said ##x = v^2##, ##a = v'^2##, but it was).
 
PeterDonis said:
That's because he knew you were using the unprimed reference frame.That's because they're not fine if you have already chosen the unprimed reference frame.Obviously not, because in post #21 you switched reference frames (you didn't realize that's what you were doing when you said ##x = v^2##, ##a = v'^2##, but it was).
Thank you. Yes, I wrote ##L' (v'^2)## instead of ##L'(v^2)##, right?
 
Hak said:
Thank you. Yes, I wrote ##L' (v'^2)## instead of ##L'(v^2)##, right?
The switching was in defining ##x = v^2## and ##a = v'^2## instead of the other way around.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
PeterDonis said:
That's because they're not fine if you have already chosen the unprimed reference frame.

I still cannot understand this. I would be grateful if you could explain it again in a way that I can understand it. Thank you very much for your contribution.
 
PeterDonis said:
Obviously not, because in post #21 you switched reference frames (you didn't realize that's what you were doing when you said ##x = v^2##, ##a = v'^2##, but it was).
I guess I didn't really understand. So you can change the frame of reference, but you can't reverse ##x## and ##a##, right?
 
Hak said:
I would be grateful if you could explain it again in a way that I can understand it.
I'm not sure what more I can say. When you define ##x = v'^2##, ##a = v^2##, you are choosing the unprimed frame. That's just a fact. There is no "explanation" for it. So if you say ##x = v^2##, ##a = v'^2##, that is inconsistent with choosing the unprimed frame. What more is there to say?
 
Hak said:
So you can change the frame of reference, but you can't reverse ##x## and ##a##, right?
Wrong. Reversing ##x## and ##a## is changing the frame of reference. But then you have to start the whole analysis over from the beginning. You can't just reverse them in one equation, that was obtained by a series of approximations that assumed you were using the unprimed frame.
 
PeterDonis said:
When you define ##x = v'^2##, ##a = v^2##, you are choosing the unprimed frame. That's just a fact. There is no "explanation" for it. So if you say ##x = v^2##, ##a = v'^2##, that is inconsistent with choosing the unprimed frame. What more is there to say?
I did not understand what calculations I should have done to choose the primed frame of reference. Should I change all the calculations in the unfolding to do that? Thank you very much.
 
Hak said:
I did not understand what calculations I should have done to choose the primed frame of reference. Should I change all the calculations in the unfolding to do that?
See post #40.
 
@PeterDonis Thank you so much for everything, I think I understand. You really gave me a great amount of help. Thank you again.