Rearranging a formula (segment area)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pavadrin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Formula
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 9K views
pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hey
I’ve been given a problem to solve involving the minor segment of a circle. I know that the formula to solve for a segment is:

[tex]S = \frac{1}{2}r^2 (\theta - \sin \theta )[/tex]

However in this problem I’ve been given the segment area and the radius of the circle and been ask to find the minor angle. So far the best I have managed in rearranging the formula is:

[tex]\theta - \sin \theta = \frac{{2S}}{{r^2 }}[/tex]

I am confused on what to do with the sin theta part, so if somebody out there is able to help it will be greatly appreciated. Or am I wasting my time and this is not possible?
Many thanks in advance
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only way I can fathom to solve this is to plot the graphs of theta and sin(theta) over the interval {0; pi} and read the answer off the graph.
 
okay thanks for that, didn't even consider graphing it :)
 
pavadrin said:
okay thanks for that, didn't even consider graphing it :)
You can use derivatives. If you have been given a function f(x). this function has a local minimum/maximum at those x values where [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex]. To be sure you are looking at a local minimum, you need to make a sign chart of the first derivative you just calculated. At those x-points when the sign of the [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex] changes from - to + , you are in a minimum.

In your case you have a function S of both r and [tex]\theta[/tex]. The [tex]\theta[/tex] corresponding to the minimum segment can be found by taking the first derivative of S with respect to r ([tex]\theta[/tex] is considered to be a constant) and solve that equation for [tex]\theta[/tex].

this should get you started

regards
marlon
 
If you can assume that the angle is tiny, you may approximate the sine with a finite sum, say [tex]\sin(\theta)\approx\theta-\frac{\theta^{3}}{6}[/tex]
This will yield:
[tex]\frac{\theta^{3}}{6}\approx\frac{2S}{r^{2}}\to\theta\approx(\frac{12S}{r^{2}})^{\frac{1}{3}}[/tex]
 
marlon said:
You can use derivatives. If you have been given a function f(x). this function has a local minimum/maximum at those x values where [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex]. To be sure you are looking at a local minimum, you need to make a sign chart of the first derivative you just calculated. At those x-points when the sign of the [tex]\frac{df(x)}{dx} = 0[/tex] changes from - to + , you are in a minimum.

In your case you have a function S of both r and [tex]\theta[/tex]. The [tex]\theta[/tex] corresponding to the minimum segment can be found by taking the first derivative of S with respect to r ([tex]\theta[/tex] is considered to be a constant) and solve that equation for [tex]\theta[/tex].

this should get you started

regards
marlon

marlon, what does this problem have to do with finding a minimum?
 
HallsofIvy said:
marlon, what does this problem have to do with finding a minimum?
Well, isn't he supposed to find the angle corresponding to the minimum segment surface ?

marlon
 
Office_Shredder said:
No, he's trying to find what angle a segment intersects on a circle given the radius of the circle and the length of the segment
Opps then i misread the question.

marlon
 
Perhaps you misread " the minor segment ". Two radii divide a circle into two arcs. Unless the radii are part of the same diameter, one arc is smaller than the other: the "minor arc" and, by extension, forms the "minor segment".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Perhaps you misread " the minor segment ". Two radii divide a circle into two arcs. Unless the radii are part of the same diameter, one arc is smaller than the other: the "minor arc" and, by extension, forms the "minor segment".
KABOOMMMM... Indeed you are right : i completely misread that question. Thanks for the clarification.

regards
marlon